User contributions for Gmaxwell
Results for Gmaxwell talk block log uploads logs global block log global account abuse log
A user with 360 edits.
25 June 2020
- 22:3622:36, 25 June 2020 diff hist 85 Community open letter on renaming/signatures →Wikimedia community members
30 April 2019
23 October 2013
- 20:0820:08, 23 October 2013 diff hist −1,843 Deletionism →Arguments against deletion: Remove a bunch of text that suggested the existence of actual "deletionists" as a serious self identifying group. If you're going to add that you'll need to cite some evidence for this groups existence.
15 June 2013
- 00:4600:46, 15 June 2013 diff hist 41 m Talk:PRISM make it clear that there is more than one government.
- 00:4500:45, 15 June 2013 diff hist 2,095 Talk:PRISM →Feedback: respond
24 April 2013
- 19:2719:27, 24 April 2013 diff hist 262 Requests for comment/Activity levels of advanced administrative rights holders →Time period of activity: re
23 July 2012
- 20:0420:04, 23 July 2012 diff hist 1,016 Requests for comment/Travel Guide →Support: support
19 January 2012
- 06:2206:22, 19 January 2012 diff hist 1 m English Wikipedia anti-SOPA blackout/Post-mortem →Media: s
- 06:2106:21, 19 January 2012 diff hist 2 m English Wikipedia anti-SOPA blackout/Post-mortem →Media: tyop
- 06:2106:21, 19 January 2012 diff hist 105 English Wikipedia anti-SOPA blackout/Post-mortem These are more could have been better.
- 06:1906:19, 19 January 2012 diff hist 330 English Wikipedia anti-SOPA blackout/Post-mortem →Media
- 06:1706:17, 19 January 2012 diff hist 50 English Wikipedia anti-SOPA blackout/Post-mortem →Technical Issues
- 03:2403:24, 19 January 2012 diff hist 341 English Wikipedia anti-SOPA blackout/Post-mortem →Technical issues
18 January 2012
- 01:3501:35, 18 January 2012 diff hist 2,289 Foundation wiki feedback →My intellectual rights: are more respected here than on most of the internet.
5 October 2011
- 03:0003:00, 5 October 2011 diff hist 1,974 Talk:Project-wide protests comments.
- 02:3602:36, 5 October 2011 diff hist 175 Project-wide protests →Cons
- 02:3302:33, 5 October 2011 diff hist 807 Project-wide protests some comments
17 June 2011
- 19:2219:22, 17 June 2011 diff hist 201 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011/Results/en →Complete votes dump: re
- 17:2917:29, 17 June 2011 diff hist 538 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011/Results/en re
16 June 2011
- 20:4420:44, 16 June 2011 diff hist 773 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011 →Delays and Lessons: re
13 June 2011
- 08:5708:57, 13 June 2011 diff hist 476 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011 →Not the Schulze method again: re
30 May 2011
- 20:3220:32, 30 May 2011 diff hist 435 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011 →One candidate is indefinitely blocked: re
- 03:3403:34, 30 May 2011 diff hist 496 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011 →One candidate is indefinitely blocked: re
- 03:2803:28, 30 May 2011 diff hist 360 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011 →Where to vote?: re
- 02:4502:45, 30 May 2011 diff hist 378 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011 →One candidate is indefinitely blocked: re
29 May 2011
- 03:1203:12, 29 May 2011 diff hist 718 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011 No edit summary
18 May 2011
- 14:3714:37, 18 May 2011 diff hist 1 Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011/Candidates/en ordering
16 May 2011
- 04:1704:17, 16 May 2011 diff hist 678 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011 →Not the Schulze method again: re
- 04:0804:08, 16 May 2011 diff hist −62 Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011/Candidates/en Fix that Navigation to use the alphabetical order used in the prior years and not the current 'candidate selected' order. The statements are still displayed in random order, of course.
15 May 2011
- 03:3003:30, 15 May 2011 diff hist 679 Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011 →Questions sandbox?: new section
6 May 2011
- 20:0120:01, 6 May 2011 diff hist 30 Wikimedia Foundation elections/Board elections/2011/Candidates/en fix the shuffling. I propose we disqualify candidates who break it. ;)
14 February 2011
- 18:0218:02, 14 February 2011 diff hist 28 m Deletionism More ways that it's used.
- 18:0118:01, 14 February 2011 diff hist 29 m Deletionism →Arguments against deletion
- 17:5917:59, 14 February 2011 diff hist 234 Talk:Deletionism →POV?
- 17:5217:52, 14 February 2011 diff hist 161 Deletionism →Arguments against deletion: good search is a reason not to delete articles.
- 17:4917:49, 14 February 2011 diff hist −25 m Deletionism →Rationale for deletion: image quote
- 17:4917:49, 14 February 2011 diff hist 330 Deletionism →Rationale for deletion: reduce name calling, copyedits
- 17:4217:42, 14 February 2011 diff hist 1 m Deletionism →Beliefs: copyedit
- 17:4117:41, 14 February 2011 diff hist 1,109 Deletionism Import Phil Sandifer's essay, though I've left it unattributed because he deleted it and I don't know if he wants anything to do with it.
- 16:1116:11, 14 February 2011 diff hist 145 m Deletionism random copyedits.
- 16:0816:08, 14 February 2011 diff hist −39 Deletionism Namecalling reductions
- 16:0516:05, 14 February 2011 diff hist 350 Deletionism →Rationale for deletionism
- 16:0216:02, 14 February 2011 diff hist 309 Deletionism Deletionism does not always mean removing information.
- 16:0016:00, 14 February 2011 diff hist 323 Deletionism intro rewrite that makes it more clear that "deletionism" is usually used as a slur.
- 15:5215:52, 14 February 2011 diff hist 362 Deletionism →Beliefs: on technical measures
- 15:4915:49, 14 February 2011 diff hist 52 m Deletionism Not quite sure how I reverted myself, but undoing.
- 15:4815:48, 14 February 2011 diff hist 809 Talk:Deletionism →Storage: new section
- 15:4415:44, 14 February 2011 diff hist −139 Deletionism Removing misguided argument against deletionism, see talk.
- 15:4315:43, 14 February 2011 diff hist 52 Deletionism A somewhat tongue in cheek emphasis of how the word "deletionism" is a slur created through false contrast with "inclusionist". It's akin to calling the side opposing pro-life "pro-death" re-abortion.