Viewing abuse filter 11: Don't deface COIBot reports

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	11
Description: (publicly viewable)
Filter hits:	452 hits
Statistics:	Of the last 8,507 actions, this filter has matched 0 (0%). On average, its run time is 0.06 ms, and it consumes 1 condition of the condition limit.
Conditions: (documentation)	user_age == 0 & page_prefixedtitle contains "COIBot" & ( ( page_namespace == 2 & ( edit_delta <= 0 \| edit_delta >= 5000 ) ) \| ( page_namespace == 3 & edit_delta >= 0 ) ) user_age == 0 & page_prefixedtitle contains "COIBot" & ( ( page_namespace == 2 & ( edit_delta <= 0 \| edit_delta >= 5000 ) ) \| ( page_namespace == 3 & edit_delta >= 0 ) )
Notes:	Anons need to not blank COIBot reports or remove content - chances are near 100% it's the spammer trying to cover their tracks (even though this only makes them stand out and raise our ire). Also, no adding lots of nonsense - anything they want to say on the report can easily be said in less then 2000 bytes. No creating/adding to the talk page - they should leave messages in the discussion section. For now: log, warn, (tag) * Removed 'tag' as it's set at 'disallow' --> no need. -df#01082011T@2003 *Reduce average condition count. Removed warn action because the message says "if your edit was constructive, hit save again", yet the filter is also in disallow ~MA
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter Mark as deleted Global filter
Filter last modified:	02:10, 22 February 2019 by MusikAnimal (talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"user_age == 0 \u0026\r\npage_prefixedtitle contains \"COIBot\" \u0026 (\r\n (\r\n page_namespace == 2 \u0026\r\n ( edit_delta \u003C= 0 \| edit_delta \u003E= 5000 )\r\n ) \| (\r\n page_namespace == 3 \u0026\r\n edit_delta \u003E= 0\r\n )\r\n)","name":"Don't deface COIBot reports","comments":"Anons need to not blank COIBot reports or remove content - chances are near 100% it's the spammer trying to cover their tracks (even though this only makes them stand out and raise our ire).\r\nAlso, no adding lots of nonsense - anything they want to say on the report can easily be said in less then 2000 bytes.\r\nNo creating/adding to the talk page - they should leave messages in the discussion section.\r\nFor now: log, warn, (tag)\r\n* Removed 'tag' as it's set at 'disallow' --\u003E no need. -df#01082011T@2003\r\n*Reduce average condition count. Removed warn action because the message says \"if your edit was constructive, hit save again\", yet the filter is also in disallow ~MA","group":"default","actions":{"disallow":["abusefilter-disallowed"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"disallow":["abusefilter-disallowed"]}}

Actions to take when matched

Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit

Number of actions to allow:

Period of time (in seconds):

Group throttle by:

user

See the documentation on mediawiki.org.

Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning

System message to use for warning:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Prevent the user from performing the action in question

System message to use for disallowing:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

(do not set on global filters) Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status

(do not set on global filters) Block the user and/or IP address from editing

Block the user and/or IP address from editing their own talk page

Block duration for non-registered users:

Block duration for registered users:

Tag the edit for further review

Tags to apply:

Require the user to complete a CAPTCHA in order to proceed with the action. Users with permission to skip a CAPTCHA are exempt.