Wikidata:Property proposal/music album
published as part of
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Description | larger work which a given work forms an independently available component of |
---|---|
Data type | Item |
Example 1 | Make You Feel My Love (Q56085788) → 19 (Q208902) |
Example 2 | MISSING |
Example 3 | MISSING |
Motivation
editThis property proposal was created as the first comment in the below section, without the standard proposal template. I have modified it so that the property is distinct to published in (P1433) but would still mean roughly the same as the property of the original proposal in the context of music releases.
This property would be the same as P1433, except that it means that the given work was published with the larger work but is functionally its own publication (i.e. you can buy the given work on iTunes without buying the rest of the album; the given work is played on the radio without the rest of the album being played). I find this a bit difficult to explain, and it works better with digital releases than with physical releases, but hopefully it makes sense.
– The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jc86035 (talk • contribs) at 13:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC).
Discussion
editI support the beginning of adding songs to which album they are part of, instead of jsut "part of". J 1982 (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- @J 1982: I've changed your post to the standard property proposal format. Jc86035 (talk) 13:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose unnecessary inverse of tracklist (P658) Germartin1 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Why would "part of" be better? --- Jura 17:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Not done Not enough support.--Micru (talk) 22:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)