Wikidata:Property proposal/Macedonian cadastral municipality ID
(Redirected from Wikidata:Property proposal/cadastral municipality ID)
Macedonian cadastral municipality ID
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Description | identifier of Macedonian cadastral municipalities |
---|---|
Represents | cadastral municipality (Q253326) |
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | Macedonian cadastral municipalities like CM Nebregovo (Q98104040) and places like Žirovnica, Mavrovo and Rostuša (Q3136902) |
Example 1 | CM Nebregovo (Q98104040) → 20071 |
Example 2 | Nebregovo (Q3084662) → 20071 |
Example 3 | CM Žirovnica (Q98104551) → 07034 |
Example 4 | Žirovnica, Mavrovo and Rostuša (Q3136902) → 07034 |
Source | List of sample cadastral departments in Macedonia (cadastral municipality IDs are in the second column of the table below); |
Planned use | I plan to create items about all cadastral municipalities in Macedonia and need a property for storing their IDs. Given that the area covered by the cadastral municipalities corresponds to the area spanned by the settlements, this property can be conveniently added to the items about settlements in a similar way as postal code (P281) and local dialing code (P473). Properties on cadastral municipality IDs already exist for Austria (see cadastral municipality ID in Austria (P8322)) and Serbia (see Serbia cadastral municipality ID (P3731). |
Number of IDs in source | 1,913 |
See also | cadastral municipality ID in Austria (P8322), Serbia cadastral municipality ID (P3731), Czech cadastral area ID (P7526) |
Motivation
editThe item cadastral municipality (Q253326) contains a statement with a list of several European countries that use this system of land division, so having this generic property will be beneficial in the storage of data on cadastral units.Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Support for macedonian property,. Oppose for generic property, because one-country property can be easily formated and used. With generic property there is need to store some qualifier and it makes is harder to use. JAn Dudík (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose and Support per JAn Dudík --- Jura 20:51, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for your thoughts. Creating a one-country property is also fine.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:34, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Kiril Simeonovski: can you update the proposal template accordingly? --- Jura 06:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC)