(Q53542949)

15 May 2018

title

How stable are people's preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients? (English)

1 reference

15 May 2018

0 references

Ubel PA

1

1 reference

15 May 2018

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 October 1999

1 reference

15 May 2018

Social Science and Medicine

published in

1 reference

15 May 2018

volume

49

1 reference

15 May 2018

issue

7

1 reference

15 May 2018

page(s)

895-903

1 reference

15 May 2018

Health care rationing: the public's debate

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Measuring public priorities for insurable health care

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Involving the public: practical and ethical issues

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Bentham in a box: technology assessment and health care allocation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Use of ethical criteria in medical decision making. Corneal transplantation.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Oregon puts bold health plan on ice

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

The trade-off between severity of illness and treatment effect in cost-value analysis of health care

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Assessing the value of a new pharmaceutical. A feasibility study of contingent valuation in managed care

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Is the person trade-off a valid method for allocating health care resources?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Willingness to pay for antihypertensive care: evidence from a staff-model HMO.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

The importance of perspective in the measurement of quality-adjusted life years

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning distribution of intensive care resources. The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

The challenge of measuring community values in ways appropriate for setting health care priorities

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: A partial explanation of why Oregon's cost-effectiveness list failed.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Value measurement in cost-utility analysis: explaining the discrepancy between rating scale and person trade-off elicitations.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Public preferences for prevention versus cure: what if an ounce of prevention is worth only an ounce of cure?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00174-4

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

15 May 2018

1 reference

15 May 2018