Welcome to Bulbapedia, Samueljoo! | |
By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:
| |
Thank you, and have a good time editing here! |
Your edits
Please stop changing sentences like that. They make no sense and they are fine the way they are. Pokedex493 (talk) 04:12, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hello. The statement above is referring to some of your grammatical edits. I wanted to ask you to please double-check your grammar when editing an article. Specifically, make sure that the same tense is used throughout each paragraph. Try to avoid contractions as they are considered somewhat in informal and we try to use grammar that is more formal. In addition, I noticed that you often change or remove the word "angry". "Angry" is okay to use here. Finally, the plural form of Pokémon is "Pokémon". Thank you for reading. Crystal Talian 04:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for replying. Don't worry, you're not causing trouble. Everybody makes mistakes. Just so you know, we try to keep conversations on one talkpage. You can reply here and I'll still see it. Also, if you want to leave a someone a message, be sure it's on their talkpage and not their userpage. Thanks, and happy editing! Crystal Talian 06:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Regarding Word Choice and Grammar
Hello. I've noticed that you've been changing or removing words like "angry" or "outraged" in articles. I was wondering why? As I mentioned earlier, there is nothing wrong with the use of these words in articles. In fact, they are often the best choice of word because of the context. Also, I would like to remind you to work on your grammar. Thanks. Crystal Talian 04:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- I wanna remind you to check on your grammar when you change sentences. Some of the changes you've made (here for example) make no grammatical sense, and are better as they are. Please be careful when changing sentences to make sure they're grammatically sound. Thanks! --It's Funktastic~!話してください 07:07, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Evolutionary stone
Article titles on Bulbapedia are written in sentence case, so terms are only capitalized if they are officially. To my knowledge, evolutionary stone is fan conjecture, so should not be capitalized. If you have a source where it is capitalized, please provide it. --SnorlaxMonster 13:09, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Ditto Legendaries
Please stop adding that Ditto can't breed with legendaries to pages. All unbreedable legendaries (every legendary sans Phione/Manaphy) are in the Undiscovered Egg Group, and it is already mentioned on all pages related to Ditto's breeding that Ditto cannot breed with any Pokemon in that egg group. Thank you. --It's Funktastic~!話してください 02:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Mega Evolution
If you want to add something back to an article after being reverted, discuss it with the user or on the article's talk page. Either way, no. Mega Evolution does not make the Pokemon evolve into a second final form. That implies that they become different Pokemon, which they don't. They transform into powered-up versions of their current form. That's how it works. Ataro (talk) 02:46, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- You've have been told repeatedly not to make changes implying Mega Evolution is a form of standard evolution. It is not a "true" or "second" final form. It is the exact same Pokemon in a different state. Hence why the name does not change. "Mega Venusaur" is still Venusaur, it is not an evolved form of Venusaur. If you make one of these edits again, you will be facing a block for insubordination. Crystal Talian 03:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- You've been told numerous times to stop changing this. Mega Evolution is a tranformation into a powered-up version of its current form. It is not an evolution, if it was, it would change into something completely different. This is your final warning.--ForceFire 04:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Your edits again
You're still making the same mistakes that you've been warned about long time ago. You spell Pokémon incorrectly, you don't use link templates, and your sentences are grammatically poor, often not making sense at all. If you don't improve your edits, you may be blocked for not abiding by the manual of style.--電禅Den Zen 02:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Diantha
Whilst I do know she'll appear in the future, we don't know which episode exactly and it was also a preview, previews don't count as actual episodes. So wait until we know which episode she will appear in before re adding it.--ForceFire 10:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Again about Mega Evolution
Please stop removing the hidden thing on Mega Evolution, it's not an evolution method and Force Fire has already protected this page. Do this one more time and I'll contact an admin and block you. --Cinday123 (Talk) 03:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Mega Evolution, again
Please stop editing the Mega Evolution page to add that it is an evolution. It is not an evolution it is a transformation method. Continual edits of this kind will lead to another block.--ForceFire 03:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- No, Mega Evolution is evolution which is as a second evolution method allows evolve into final form for one-evolution families and second/true final form for two-evolution families and devolve into previous forms. This Mega Evolution is transformation is wrong. --Samueljoo (talk) 01:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Mega Evolution update
This is the last time you'll be told not to argue about Mega Evolutions (this includes Primal Reversions). The next time you bring up the issue, you will be blocked for greatly extended periods of time. Please transfer your energy towards something more constructive. ★Jo the Marten★ ಠ_ಠ♥ 08:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Frogadier
Yes, we know he evolves, but we don't add anything about the evolution until the episode airs. Thank you.--ForceFire 13:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Primal Reversion
Hello. I wanted Primal Reversion, like Mega Evolution, does not result in a 'true form'. So edits such as this [1] are not acceptable. Please do not add it back. Thanks. Crystal Talian 05:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Primal Reversion, Mega Evolution
It appears you still haven't gotten the message. Stop adding "true form" onto any pages related to Primal Reversions or Mega Evolutions, they are not refered to as true forms anyway in the franchise. This is your final warning.--ForceFire 02:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)