Hetaeria

-3 (maximum dubium) Latinitas huius rei maxime dubia est. Corrige si potes. Vide {{latinitas}}.

Hetaeria^[1] inter genera sociologica motuum religiosorum est societas cuius mores a consuetudinibus moribusve civicis generalioribus deviant.^[2] Utrum autem, cuidam societatis doctrinae et consuetudines an satis deviae an novae sunt, saepe est ambiguum et definitionem accuratam constituendum igitur est aerumnosum. ^[3]^[4] Vox Anglice 'cult' saepe indignas significat.^[5]^[6] et dilectu adhibetur proponentibus rationis coertionis persuasionis.

Hetaeria sensu hodierno (variis linguis variatim nuncupata, Anglice cult vel sect, Hispanice culto vel secta, Italice secte, Germanice sekta, Gallice secte, Iaponice karuto) ad novum motum religiosum spectat, saepe cum controversia coniunctum, cuius praecepta, dogma, et mores tam monstrosa, aliena, periculosa, vel atrocissima quidem habentur, quod causa tromocratiae esse potest. Nimirium dissimilitudine, non est cultus sensu vetere. Mota religiosa, decennio 194, cultús facti materia inquisitionibus fuit. Decennio 198, surrexerunt varia mota contra cultum in Civitatibus Foederatis ob scelera gregum maxime Manson Family et Peoples Temple. Medio aevo, praecipue ab 1610 ad 1620,^[7] vox cultus vulgata est sensu divergente quia facta est vox eiusdem paucis mutationibus in variis linguis. Similiter vulgata est vox secta praecipue in linguis romanicis et aliis.

Notae

↑ Traianus imperator apud Plinium minorem 10.43.1
↑ Stark, Rodney, William Brainbridge (1996). A Theory of Religion. Rutgers University Press. p. 124. ISBN 0813523303 .
↑ OED, American Journal of Sociology 85 (1980), p. 1377: "Cults[...], like other deviant social movements, tend to recruit people with a grievance, people who suffer from some variety of deprivation."
↑ Chuck Shaw, Sects and Cults – Greenville Technical College – Retrieved 21 March 2013.
↑ T. L. Brink (2008), Psychology: A Student Friendly Approach, "Unit 13: Social Psychology" [1].
↑ Olson, Paul J. 2006. "The Public Perception of “Cults” and “New Religious Movements,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45 (1): 97–106.
↑ Quoddam dictionarium.

Nexus interni

Fundamentalismus

[1] Traianus imperator apud Plinium minorem 10.43.1

[2] Stark, Rodney, William Brainbridge (1996). A Theory of Religion. Rutgers University Press. p. 124. ISBN 0813523303 .

[3] OED, American Journal of Sociology 85 (1980), p. 1377: "Cults[...], like other deviant social movements, tend to recruit people with a grievance, people who suffer from some variety of deprivation."

[4] Chuck Shaw, Sects and Cults – Greenville Technical College – Retrieved 21 March 2013.

[5] T. L. Brink (2008), Psychology: A Student Friendly Approach, "Unit 13: Social Psychology" [1].

[6] Olson, Paul J. 2006. "The Public Perception of “Cults” and “New Religious Movements,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45 (1): 97–106.

[7] Quoddam dictionarium.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]