Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(2 edits)

Just "Rate to Rate" does not mean that the rating is inflated, I was giving everyone a fair rating based on their projects
And I expect the same from the people who evaluated my game.

Deleted 1 year ago

So please, if you're lucky and your game is appreciated without such measures, you're in luck! I so wish I didn't have to beg for votes to know how good/bad my game is

Stop trying to shut down the last working method of getting your projects rated

You don't get it, most people don't get enough rating because of the 'rate for rate'-posts. All it do is to give attention to a very few games. 

( 1)

So is there a limited number of grades or what? I don't understand.

also look at the scores of my game, how very much attention was taken away?)

If you had zero before it seem to have got 15 ratings. But this not so much the point. You should have gotten the same number of ratings by playing, rating and given feedback to others games, without having to write a 'rate for rate'-post.  The issue is that you have to beg for getting those ratings, it should be a natural part of take a active part of game jam. And yes think it I would be a great idea to limit to how many rating you can get, or at least have a limit it until most games has gotten at least 20 ratings.