glibc 2.40 #20993
Merged
glibc 2.40 #20993
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Expecting |
|
Nice work! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First attempt at this, so hopefully I didn't mess it up too badly. I followed the documented procedure (except for
abilistswhich was done in #20949). Ran the full test suite locally with-fqemu --glibc-runtimes <...>.Since the diff was relatively small this time around, I manually reviewed every hunk and carefully avoided overwriting our glibc patches. (Most of it is just
C2X->C23and__USE_TIME_BITS64->__USE_TIME64_REDIRECTSchurn.) Still, if replaying the patches on top of a clean update is preferable, I can do that instead.Notably, this update adds missing headers for
arc-linux-gnuandsparc-linux-gnu.Closes #20950.