fixes (ziglang#16617) #20548
Merged
fixes (ziglang#16617) #20548
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…es. Changed test case to reflect new logic
mlugg
reviewed
Jul 9, 2024
test/cases/compile_errors/directly_embedding_opaque_type_in_struct_and_union.zig
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
cc merge didnt close issue |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fix(#16617)
Added check to Sema.analyzeAs for opaque destination types. Changed test case to reflect new logic.
With this changes code like
const a = @as(anyopaque, undefined);is no longer valid. I dont know if these are the intended semantics for opaque types though.