Deployment & Documentation & Stats & License

Background: Outlier detection (OD) is a key data mining task for identifying abnormal objects from general samples with numerous high-stake applications including fraud detection and intrusion detection.

We propose TOD, a system for efficient and scalable outlier detection (OD) on distributed multi-GPU machines. A key idea behind TOD is decomposing OD applications into basic tensor algebra operations for GPU acceleration.

Citing TOD: Check out the design paper. If you use TOD in a scientific publication, we would appreciate citations to the following paper:

@article{zhao2021tod,
  title={TOD: GPU-accelerated Outlier Detection via Tensor Operations},
  author={Zhao, Yue and Chen, George H and Jia, Zhihao},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14007},
  year={2021}
}

or:

Zhao, Y., Chen, G.H. and Jia, Z., 2021. TOD: GPU-accelerated Outlier Detection via Tensor Operations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14007.

On average, TOD is 11 times faster than PyOD on a diverse group of OD algorithms!

If you need another reason: it can handle much larger datasets---more than a million sample OD within an hour!

GPU-accelerated Outlier Detection with 5 Lines of Code:

# train the COPOD detector
from pytod.models.knn import KNN
clf = KNN() # default GPU device is used
clf.fit(X_train)

# get outlier scores
y_train_scores = clf.decision_scores_  # raw outlier scores on the train data
y_test_scores = clf.decision_function(X_test)  # predict raw outlier scores on test

TOD is featured for:

• Unified APIs, detailed documentation, and examples for the easy use (under construction)
• More than 5 different OD algorithms and more are being added
• The support of multi-GPU acceleration
• Advanced techniques including provable quantization and automatic batching

Table of Contents:

• Installation
• Implemented Algorithms
• A Motivating Example PyOD vs. PyTOD
• Paper Reproducibility
• Programming Model Interface
• End-to-end Performance Comparison with PyOD

It is recommended to use pip for installation. Please make sure the latest version is installed, as PyTOD is updated frequently:

pip install pytod            # normal install
pip install --upgrade pytod  # or update if needed

Alternatively, you could clone and run setup.py file:

git clone https://github.com/yzhao062/pytod.git
cd pyod
pip install .

Required Dependencies:

• Python 3.6
• mpmath
• numpy>=1.13
• torch>=1.7 (it is safer if you install by yourself)
• scipy>=0.19.1
• scikit_learn>=0.21
• pyod>=1.0.4 (for comparison)

PyTOD toolkit consists of three major functional groups (to be cleaned up):

(i) Individual Detection Algorithms :

Code is being released. Watch and star for the latest news!

kNN example shows that how fast and how easy PyTOD is. Take the famous kNN outlier detection as an example:

1. Initialize a kNN detector, fit the model, and make the prediction.

   from pytod.models.knn import KNN   # kNN detector
   
   # train kNN detector
   clf_name = 'KNN'
   clf = KNN()
   clf.fit(X_train)

   # if GPU is not available, use CPU instead
   clf = KNN(device='cpu')
   clf.fit(X_train)

2. Get the prediction results

   # get the prediction label and outlier scores of the training data
   y_train_pred = clf.labels_  # binary labels (0: inliers, 1: outliers)
   y_train_scores = clf.decision_scores_  # raw outlier scores

3. On a simple laptop, let us see how fast it is in comparison to PyOD for 30,000 samples with 20 features

   KNN-PyOD ROC:1.0, precision @ rank n:1.0
   Execution time 11.26 seconds

   KNN-PyTOD-GPU ROC:1.0, precision @ rank n:1.0
   Execution time 2.82 seconds

   KNN-PyTOD-CPU ROC:1.0, precision @ rank n:1.0
   Execution time 3.36 seconds

It is easy to see, PyTOD shows both better efficiency than PyOD.

Datasets: OD benchmark datasets are available at datasets folder.

Scripts for reproducibility is available in reproducibility folder.

Cleanup is on the way!

Complex OD algorithms can be abstracted into common tensor operators.

For instance, ABOD and COPOD can be assembled by the basic tensor operators.

Overall, it is much (on avg. 11 times) faster than PyOD takes way less run time.