Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade jekyll-last-modified-at from 1.3.0 to 1.3.2 #388

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: new-site
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xRahul
Copy link
Owner

@xRahul xRahul commented Jun 5, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 4 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Gemfile
  • Gemfile.lock

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-RUBY-ADDRESSABLE-1316242
  589  
medium severity Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
SNYK-RUBY-REXML-6861566
  551  
medium severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data
SNYK-RUBY-KRAMDOWN-1087436
  505  
low severity Improper Input Validation
SNYK-RUBY-REXML-1244518
  390  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Deserialization of Untrusted Data
🦉 Improper Input Validation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants