Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

get available plugins? #112

Closed
dakom opened this issue Sep 4, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

get available plugins? #112

dakom opened this issue Sep 4, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees
@ntadej
Milestone
1.0 beta 2 (0.91.0)

Comments

@dakom
Copy link

dakom commented Sep 4, 2015

Two part question :)

  1. Is there an easy way to get a list of available plugins? (bonus if it can list which ones are loaded!)

  2. If not- would it be easy to add a VlcCommon::getPluginPath()? Since plugins must follow a specific naming convention- one could just list the files from that location which match that pattern
@ntadej
Copy link
Member

ntadej commented Sep 13, 2015

Why do you need this information?

You can get list of audio and video filters directly from libvlc
https://www.videolan.org/developers/vlc/doc/doxygen/html/group__libvlc__core.html#gaaeb3d86da9e6544ef4894b9f0a2c411f

I can wrap this for you if it is useful.

@dakom
Copy link
Author

dakom commented Sep 13, 2015

Yeah- would be cool if you could add that and it's not too much trouble :)

At the moment it's just to see which dlls are actually used and what I really need to package, without relying on DependancyWalker, but it also helps some debugging cases

@ntadej ntadej added this to the 1.0 beta 2 (0.91.0) milestone Sep 20, 2015
@ntadej ntadej self-assigned this Sep 20, 2015
@ntadej ntadej closed this as completed in 0640114 Sep 22, 2015
@dakom
Copy link
Author

dakom commented Sep 24, 2015

Thanks :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ntadej ntadej

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0 beta 2 (0.91.0)
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ntadej @dakom