Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Add another proxy protocol #119

Closed
Jelingam opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Add another proxy protocol #119

Jelingam opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Jelingam
Copy link
Contributor

Jelingam commented Jul 8, 2024

hey phil
thanks for your great work.
me and my friends was fascinated by your work and we want to use this awesome project
but there is some technical issue to lunch docker or other way you suggested.
telegram in my country was banned by regime, they want to silent us and suppress people.
every single person in my country use a vpn or proxy for social apps.
several vpn and proxy i was used and common point to all of this is "Socks5" protocol.
if u add this protocol to proxy part, i would be so grateful.
thank you in advance

@thebrumby
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

I’m pleased to hear you find the project interesting. I will look at adding better proxy support next week.

Thanks

@thebrumby thebrumby added the Enhancement New feature or request label Jul 22, 2024
@thebrumby thebrumby changed the title Add another proxy protocol Feature Request: Add another proxy protocol Aug 3, 2024
@thebrumby
Copy link
Owner

After spending most of the day experimenting with different methods to implement proxy support in the project, I ultimately decided not to proceed with it.

While it is technically possible to enable proxy authentication in Selenium by modifying Chromedriver or creating a JavaScript listener as part of a custom Chrome extension, these approaches introduce complexities that extend beyond the intended scope of this project.

For these reasons, I've chosen to keep the project focused on its core objectives without adding proxy support at this time.

Thank you for understanding.

Best regards, Phil

@thebrumby
Copy link
Owner

In an update to the earlier message, we have a solution that will allow one external proxy to be nominated. Currently the only way to have multiple credentials would be to create separate Docker containers for each required connection.

https://www.patreon.com/posts/support-added-110409861?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=postshare_creator&utm_content=join_link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants