Explicitly check for response ok false in codeServerRequest #2383
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Alex-Tideman
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2024
laurakwhit
force-pushed
the
fix-encode-response-ok-check
branch
from
d409e92
to
02555d6
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description & motivation 💭
The Response object has non-enumerable properties and therefore
has(response, 'ok')will always be false even ifokexists. This PR updates the logic to explicitly check forresponse.ok === falseinstead.Screenshots (if applicable) 📸
Design Considerations 🎨
Testing 🧪
How was this tested 👻
Steps for others to test: 🚶🏽♂️🚶🏽♀️
Checklists
Draft Checklist
Merge Checklist
Issue(s) closed
DT-2522Docs
Any docs updates needed?