Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make angled parking definitions conform more closely to other standards #2111

Open
easherma opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@easherma
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
See the discussion in #1678

@calvinmetcalf
Copy link

this was related to a DOT which wanted to use streetmix to display and edit their cross section data. The streetmix relative to viewer coding of angled parking (and I think a couple other types of parking) was a real poor fit to doing that as you needed to convert the parking from relative to flow of traffic to relative to viewer. My previous pull was just the changes i had made in my local branch to display parking relative to traffic flow, the DOT in question has since ended the project and I've moved on from working with streetmix so I probably won't be able to help, but I do think display of existing data is a use of street mix that many in government are excited about.

@louh
Copy link
Member

louh commented Nov 11, 2020

@calvinmetcalf One thing that would be super helpful in creating a better integration with those standards is we connect with your DOT so we can compare data structures. Do you mind putting us in touch? Over email is great: [email protected]. Thanks!

@calvinmetcalf
Copy link

ok passing your email along

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants