Hi,

first of all thank you for the nice web template and the work you put into it.
I intend to use it for a project, but don't want to use such large assets (~50MB in this case), because it increases the load time incredibly, especially in slow networks.
Maybe a lightweight edition would be cool, also for other users. With significantly less assets, but also less functionality (graphs, etc).

Hi,

first of all thank you for the nice web template and the work you put into it.
I intend to use it for a project, but don't want to use such large assets (~50MB in this case), because it increases the load time incredibly, especially in slow networks.
Maybe a lightweight edition would be cool, also for other users. With significantly less assets, but also less functionality (graphs, etc).

Looks like we need a lite and full version, right?

Actually, all we need to do is modularize the code, let's say if someone wants to use a button, just use button.scss and that's all :) then it'll keep the size to a minimum.

Hi,
first of all thank you for the nice web template and the work you put into it.
I intend to use it for a project, but don't want to use such large assets (~50MB in this case), because it increases the load time incredibly, especially in slow networks.
Maybe a lightweight edition would be cool, also for other users. With significantly less assets, but also less functionality (graphs, etc).

Looks like we need a lite and full version, right?

Exactly, that would be cool.

Actually, all we need to do is modularize the code, let's say if someone wants to use a button, just use button.scss and that's all :) then it'll keep the size to a minimum.

That sounds good too, but I was more bothered by the Modules folder.
The CSS folder is about 300KB, the Modules folder about 50MB. And I don't necessarily know which modules I can just delete, or if any modules depend on other modules, which then have other dependencies...
(I didn't find anything in the documentation, but would be cool if that works.)

Actually, all we need to do is modularize the code, let's say if someone wants to use a button, just use button.scss and that's all :) then it'll keep the size to a minimum.

I think the same thing! Each component/element/kit has its SCSS & JS file.

Hi,
first of all thank you for the nice web template and the work you put into it.
I intend to use it for a project, but don't want to use such large assets (~50MB in this case), because it increases the load time incredibly, especially in slow networks.
Maybe a lightweight edition would be cool, also for other users. With significantly less assets, but also less functionality (graphs, etc).

Looks like we need a lite and full version, right?

Exactly, that would be cool.

Actually, all we need to do is modularize the code, let's say if someone wants to use a button, just use button.scss and that's all :) then it'll keep the size to a minimum.

That sounds good too, but I was more bothered by the Modules folder.
The CSS folder is about 300KB, the Modules folder about 50MB. And I don't necessarily know which modules I can just delete, or if any modules depend on other modules, which then have other dependencies...
(I didn't find anything in the documentation, but would be cool if that works.)

Yes, I admit that the structure of Stisla now really sucks. It really forces you to load everything that even you don't need.

In the next update, I will change the structure to follow other components to be more modular – load when you need them.

Hi,
first of all thank you for the nice web template and the work you put into it.
I intend to use it for a project, but don't want to use such large assets (~50MB in this case), because it increases the load time incredibly, especially in slow networks.
Maybe a lightweight edition would be cool, also for other users. With significantly less assets, but also less functionality (graphs, etc).

Looks like we need a lite and full version, right?

Exactly, that would be cool.

Actually, all we need to do is modularize the code, let's say if someone wants to use a button, just use button.scss and that's all :) then it'll keep the size to a minimum.

That sounds good too, but I was more bothered by the Modules folder.
The CSS folder is about 300KB, the Modules folder about 50MB. And I don't necessarily know which modules I can just delete, or if any modules depend on other modules, which then have other dependencies...
(I didn't find anything in the documentation, but would be cool if that works.)

Yes, I admit that the structure of Stisla now really sucks. It really forces you to load everything that even you don't need.

In the next update, I will change the structure to follow other components to be more modular – load when you need them.

That sounds great! Ideally, this should also make updating easier if everything does not depend on each other.

Thank you for all your work on this project. I am currently testing and considering using it as part of my next project. I know you already mentioned it, but the documentation needs some serious work. If I do end up using this template, I would love to give back to the project by updating the documentation. Thanks again!

A version that doesn't need the install of NPM, yarn etc... Not everyone uses these to build sites.

Webpack and stisla is a robust stack. I love it. Thanks, mas Nauval for your hard work to make this great web template🚀

Any idea for migrating stisla to bootstrap 5?

Any idea for migrating stisla to bootstrap 5?

Yep, but I can't work full-time for it.

I need your opinion here #203

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open for 14 days without activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within the next 14 days. If this is still an issue, just leave a comment or remove the "stale" label.

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open for 14 days without activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within the next 14 days. If this is still an issue, just leave a comment or remove the "stale" label.

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open for 14 days without activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within the next 14 days. If this is still an issue, just leave a comment or remove the "stale" label.