doc: Add deprecation list #4675
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hmm... the list is protruded a bit. Is there good idea? |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 1.7 #4675 /- ##
==========================================
Coverage 81.45% 81.45% <.01%
==========================================
Files 279 279
Lines 37382 37382
Branches 5813 5813
==========================================
Hits 30448 30449 1
Misses 5505 5505
Partials 1429 1428 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
So far, deprecated APIs are only listed as CHANGES entry. But they are not listed in one place. In this change, I gathered them to docs as a list. As a side effect, it makes CHANGES entry simple.
tk0miya
force-pushed
the
deprecation_list
branch
from
dbed964 to
bd898be
Compare
|
I just arranged the text to fold labels. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
So far, deprecated APIs are only listed as CHANGES entry. But
they are not listed in one place. In this change, I gathered them
to docs as a list.
As a side effect, it makes CHANGES entry simple.