Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Description and sub-properties of 'productID' #1309

Open
unor opened this issue Aug 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Description and sub-properties of 'productID' #1309

unor opened this issue Aug 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).

Comments

@unor
Copy link
Contributor

unor commented Aug 15, 2016

productID (Domain: Product, Range: Text):

The product identifier, such as ISBN. For example: meta itemprop="productID" content="isbn:123-456-789".


Description

I think it could use a more detailed description about the expected value. No expectation/recommendation, or does it have to use some format (like prefix:value)?

And maybe it would be better to keep the description syntax-neutral (i.e., removing the Microdata example)?

See also @danbri’s comment from 2014:

http://schema.org/productID is vague too; what should it contain?

"What are the allowed prefixes? isbn? gtin? ean? jan? upc? sku? mpn? is the colon mandatory? Is the prefix case sensitive?"
(Matthias)

Some discussion (from 2015) about this starting at #428 (comment)

Sub-properties

Currently no property has productID as super-property. Would it work to add the "gtin" properties as sub-properties? They are also defined for Offer/Demand, but productID isn’t.

See also @mfhepp’s comment from 2015:

[…] (same as productID is a superproperty to gtin13 etc.)

Note that the superproperty relations for productID are still missing in schema.org (but will follow)

@wiesmann
Copy link

What is the difference between a productID of the form prefix:value and a PropertyValue where the name=prefix and value=value?

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2020

This issue is being tagged as Stale due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!). label Aug 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants