Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to normalized triples for Fuchsia #90510

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

petrhosek
Copy link
Contributor

This is a revert of e950d22 which is no
longer needed since Clang now does normalization and handles all triple
spellings.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @pietroalbini

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 2, 2021
@camelid
Copy link
Member

camelid commented Nov 2, 2021

@petrhosek There seem to be merge conflicts. I think you'll need to rebase over upstream/master.

This is a revert of e950d22 which is no
longer needed since Clang now does normalization and handles all triple
spellings.
Copy link
Member

@tmandry tmandry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This brings Fuchsia triple naming in line with nearly every other OS, so looks good to me.

@camelid camelid added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Nov 4, 2021
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

r? rust-lang/compiler

CI changes look good, but the compiler team should actually approve the change.

@tmandry
Copy link
Member

tmandry commented Nov 18, 2021

Re-rolling

r? rust-lang/compiler

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned estebank and unassigned jackh726 Nov 18, 2021
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 19, 2021

📌 Commit 8c5fcc7 has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 19, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2021
…ebank

Switch to normalized triples for Fuchsia

This is a revert of e950d22 which is no
longer needed since Clang now does normalization and handles all triple
spellings.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2021
…ebank

Switch to normalized triples for Fuchsia

This is a revert of e950d22 which is no
longer needed since Clang now does normalization and handles all triple
spellings.
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Looks like this failed in a rollup: #91056 (comment)
@bors r- rollup=iffy

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 19, 2021
@JohnCSimon
Copy link
Member

Ping from triage:
@petrhosek Can you please post your status on this PR? Is it ready for review? Thank you.

@JohnCSimon
Copy link
Member

triage:
I'm moving this to waiting on Review... don't want to close a PR as inactive if it already has an approval - even though it hasn't moved for two months.

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-author S-waiting-on-review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 30, 2022
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

pnkfelix commented Feb 10, 2022

@petrhosek @tmandry this seemed like it failed in rollup. Can you look into it? (And let us know if this needs a new owner.)

@pnkfelix pnkfelix added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 10, 2022
@JohnCSimon
Copy link
Member

@petrhosek
Ping from triage: I'm closing this due to inactivity. This hasn't been touched in months.
Please reopen when you are ready to continue with this.
Thanks for your contribution.

@rustbot label: S-inactive

@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon closed this Mar 6, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added the S-inactive Status: Inactive and waiting on the author. This is often applied to closed PRs. label Mar 6, 2022
djkoloski pushed a commit to djkoloski/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2023
Historically, Rust's Fuchsia targets have been labeled x86_64-fuchsia
and aarch64-fuchsia. However, they should technically contain vendor
information. This CL changes Fuchsia's target triples to include the
"unknown" vendor since Clang now does normalization and handles all
triple spellings.

This was previously attempted in rust-lang#90510, which was closed due to
inactivity.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
…et_triple, r=nagisa

Add vendor to Fuchsia's target triple

Historically, Rust's Fuchsia targets have been labeled x86_64-fuchsia and aarch64-fuchsia. However, they should technically contain vendor information. This CL changes Fuchsia's target triples to include the "unknown" vendor since Clang now does normalization and handles all triple spellings.

This was previously attempted in rust-lang#90510, which was closed due to inactivity.
@workingjubilee workingjubilee added the O-fuchsia Operating system: Fuchsia label May 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
O-fuchsia Operating system: Fuchsia S-inactive Status: Inactive and waiting on the author. This is often applied to closed PRs. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.