Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation for Ipv6MulticastScope #86936

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2021

Conversation

CDirkx
Copy link
Contributor

@CDirkx CDirkx commented Jul 7, 2021

Adds basic documentation to the unstable Ipv6MulticastScope, as well as marking it #[non_exhaustive] because future IETF RFCs may introduce additional scopes. The documentation mentions this in a section "Stability Guarantees":

/// Not all possible values for a multicast scope have been assigned.
/// Future RFCs may introduce new scopes, which will be added as variants to this enum;
/// because of this the enum is marked as #[non_exhaustive].

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 7, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added the A-io Area: std::io, std::fs, std::net and std::path label Jul 7, 2021
Copy link
Member

@JohnTitor JohnTitor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The documentation itself looks good and the reason of #[non_exhaustive] makes sense to me.

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

@m-ou-se This has an unstable breaking change, does it need a review from t-libs-api or could I r it?

@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 31, 2021
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Aug 1, 2021

This has an unstable breaking change, does it need a review from t-libs-api or could I r it?

Changing unstable things is usually fine. If it's a popular API or the change is somewhat controversial, it'd be good to get the team involved.

@bors r=JohnTitor

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 1, 2021

📌 Commit a674ae6 has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 1, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2021
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#86183 (Change environment variable getters to error recoverably)
 - rust-lang#86439 (Remove `Ipv4Addr::is_ietf_protocol_assignment`)
 - rust-lang#86509 (Move `os_str_bytes` to `sys::unix`)
 - rust-lang#86593 (Partially stabilize `const_slice_first_last`)
 - rust-lang#86936 (Add documentation for `Ipv6MulticastScope`)
 - rust-lang#87282 (Ensure `./x.py dist` adheres to `build.tools`)
 - rust-lang#87468 (Update rustfmt)
 - rust-lang#87504 (Update mdbook.)
 - rust-lang#87608 (Remove unused field `Session.system_library_path`)
 - rust-lang#87629 (Consistent spelling of "adapter" in the standard library)
 - rust-lang#87633 (Update compiler_builtins to fix i128 shift/mul on thumbv6m)
 - rust-lang#87644 (Recommend `swap_remove` in `Vec::remove` docs)
 - rust-lang#87653 (mark a UB doctest as no_run)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f386ae3 into rust-lang:master Aug 2, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.56.0 milestone Aug 2, 2021
@CDirkx CDirkx deleted the ipv6-multicast branch September 3, 2021 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-io Area: std::io, std::fs, std::net and std::path S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants