Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[stable] 1.52.0 release #84864

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
May 3, 2021
Merged

[stable] 1.52.0 release #84864

merged 18 commits into from
May 3, 2021

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum commented May 3, 2021 •
edited
Loading

This includes the release notes (#84183) as well as cherry-picked commits from:

Additionally in "fresh work" we're also:

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r rollup=never p=100

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

📌 Commit cadf901 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label May 3, 2021
This was referenced May 3, 2021
Closed
Closed
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

⌛ Testing commit cadf901 with merge 4f6a3b4c86305c380b7e1f69e8f02f13b294c56b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 3, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

curl: (56) OpenSSL SSL_read: Connection reset by peer, errno 54
clang llvm-10.0.0-x86_64-apple-darwin/include/clang/Basic/ObjCRuntime.h: Lzma library error:  No progress is possible

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 3, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

⌛ Testing commit cadf901 with merge 3097c080439eb43e5aa1c4a12f392963e35099bd...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors treeclosed=99

@bors bors mentioned this pull request May 3, 2021
Merged
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

⌛ Testing commit cadf901 with merge e08fd7a5b2a28e64d6b2cf276302820a838cc42d...

@bors bors mentioned this pull request May 3, 2021
Merged
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r rollup=never p=100

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

📌 Commit 47c7b9c has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors treeclosed=99

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 47c7b9c with merge 7b7d705054f0802ad685e21d95c13bfa890367e2...

@bors bors mentioned this pull request May 3, 2021
Merged
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-cargo failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) 
fatal: Could not parse object 'caac107ae8145ef2fd20365e2b8fadaf09c2eb3b'.
From https://github.com/servo/servo
 * branch                master     -> FETCH_HEAD
fatal: Could not parse object 'caac107ae8145ef2fd20365e2b8fadaf09c2eb3b'.
error: RPC failed; curl 56 OpenSSL SSL_read: Connection was reset, errno 10054
error: 1366 bytes of body are still expected
fetch-pack: unexpected disconnect while reading sideband packet
fatal: early EOF
fatal: fetch-pack: invalid index-pack output
thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: status.success()', src\tools\cargotest\main.rs:96:13


command did not execute successfully: "D:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\stage0-tools-bin\\cargotest.exe" "D:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\stage2-tools-bin\\cargo.exe" "D:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\ct"
expected success, got: exit code: 101

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 3, 2021
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

Spurious

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry network error

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 3, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 47c7b9c with merge 88f19c6...

This was referenced May 3, 2021
Merged
Merged
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 3, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 88f19c6 to stable...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 3, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 88f19c6 into rust-lang:stable May 3, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone May 3, 2021
@bors bors mentioned this pull request May 4, 2021
Merged
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the stable-next branch May 4, 2021 01:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.52.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@Mark-Simulacrum @bors @rust-log-analyzer @pietroalbini @rustbot @pnkfelix @m-ou-se @fee1-dead