Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix rustc_ast_pretty print_qpath resulting in invalid macro input #78980

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2020

Conversation

gui1117
Copy link
Contributor

@gui1117 gui1117 commented Nov 12, 2020

related #76874 (third case)

Issue:

The input for a procedural macro is incorrect, for the rust code:

mod m {
    pub trait Tr {
        type Ts: super::Tu;
    }
}

trait Tu {
    fn dummy() { }
}

#[may_proc_macro]
fn foo() {
    <T as m::Tr>::Ts::dummy();
}

the macro will get the input:

fn foo() {
    <T as m::Tr>::dummy();
}

Thus Ts has disappeared.

Fix:

This is due to invalid pretty print of qpath. This PR fix it.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @estebank (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 12, 2020
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 13, 2020

📌 Commit 775f1e5 has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 13, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2020
Fix rustc_ast_pretty print_qpath resulting in invalid macro input

related rust-lang#76874 (third case)

### Issue:

The input for a procedural macro is incorrect, for the rust code:
```rust

mod m {
    pub trait Tr {
        type Ts: super::Tu;
    }
}

trait Tu {
    fn dummy() { }
}

#[may_proc_macro]
fn foo() {
    <T as m::Tr>::Ts::dummy();
}
```
the macro will get the input:
```rust
fn foo() {
    <T as m::Tr>::dummy();
}
```
Thus `Ts` has disappeared.

### Fix:

This is due to invalid pretty print of qpath. This PR fix it.
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2020
Fix rustc_ast_pretty print_qpath resulting in invalid macro input

related rust-lang#76874 (third case)

### Issue:

The input for a procedural macro is incorrect, for the rust code:
```rust

mod m {
    pub trait Tr {
        type Ts: super::Tu;
    }
}

trait Tu {
    fn dummy() { }
}

#[may_proc_macro]
fn foo() {
    <T as m::Tr>::Ts::dummy();
}
```
the macro will get the input:
```rust
fn foo() {
    <T as m::Tr>::dummy();
}
```
Thus `Ts` has disappeared.

### Fix:

This is due to invalid pretty print of qpath. This PR fix it.
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2020
Fix rustc_ast_pretty print_qpath resulting in invalid macro input

related rust-lang#76874 (third case)

### Issue:

The input for a procedural macro is incorrect, for the rust code:
```rust

mod m {
    pub trait Tr {
        type Ts: super::Tu;
    }
}

trait Tu {
    fn dummy() { }
}

#[may_proc_macro]
fn foo() {
    <T as m::Tr>::Ts::dummy();
}
```
the macro will get the input:
```rust
fn foo() {
    <T as m::Tr>::dummy();
}
```
Thus `Ts` has disappeared.

### Fix:

This is due to invalid pretty print of qpath. This PR fix it.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2020
Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#78352 (Do not call `unwrap` with `signatures` option enabled)
 - rust-lang#78590 (refactor: removing alloc::collections::vec_deque ignore-tidy-filelength)
 - rust-lang#78848 (Bump minimal supported LLVM version to 9)
 - rust-lang#78856 (Explicitly checking for or-pattern before test)
 - rust-lang#78948 (test: add `()=()=()=...` to weird-exprs.rs)
 - rust-lang#78962 (Add a test for r# identifiers)
 - rust-lang#78963 (Added some unit tests as requested)
 - rust-lang#78966 (Never inline C variadics, cold functions, functions with incompatible attributes ...)
 - rust-lang#78968 (Include llvm-as in llvm-tools-preview component)
 - rust-lang#78969 (Normalize function type during validation)
 - rust-lang#78980 (Fix rustc_ast_pretty print_qpath resulting in invalid macro input)
 - rust-lang#78986 (Avoid installing external LLVM dylibs)
 - rust-lang#78988 (Fix an intrinsic invocation on threaded wasm)
 - rust-lang#78993 (rustc_target: Fix dash vs underscore mismatches in option names)
 - rust-lang#79013 (Clean up outdated `use_once_payload` pretty printer comment)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4fcb617 into rust-lang:master Nov 15, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Nov 15, 2020
@gui1117 gui1117 deleted the gui-fix-qpath branch November 17, 2020 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants