Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Record coroutine kind in coroutine generics #120746

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors commented Feb 7, 2024

Oops, added a new substitution (the "kind" ty) to coroutines but forgot to record it in the generics_of. I'm surprised I left this out of the coroutine-closure PR -- I thought I made this change; I possibly rebased it out by accident.

Fixes #120732

r? oli-obk

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 7, 2024
@compiler-errors compiler-errors changed the title Record coroutine kind in generics Record coroutine kind in coroutine generics Feb 7, 2024
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Feb 7, 2024

@bors r rollup

oh fun, this seems generally like a footgun. I wonder where we could add assertions to catch missing such things.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 7, 2024

📌 Commit dcca9a1 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 7, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, it's a footgun. Confusingly, we don't really use these generics anywhere, which is why Matthias only found this when messing with -Zpolymorphize.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2024
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#110482 (Add armv8r-none-eabihf target for the Cortex-R52.)
 - rust-lang#119162 (Add unstable `-Z direct-access-external-data` cmdline flag for `rustc`)
 - rust-lang#120302 (various const interning cleanups)
 - rust-lang#120455 ( Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt SROA tests)
 - rust-lang#120470 (Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect)
 - rust-lang#120479 (Suggest turning `if let` into irrefutable `let` if appropriate)
 - rust-lang#120564 (coverage: Split out counter increment sites from BCB node/edge counters)
 - rust-lang#120633 (pattern_analysis: gather up place-relevant info)
 - rust-lang#120664 (Add parallel rustc ui tests)
 - rust-lang#120726 (Don't use bashism in checktools.sh)
 - rust-lang#120733 (MirPass: make name more const)
 - rust-lang#120735 (Remove some `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` calls)
 - rust-lang#120746 (Record coroutine kind in coroutine generics)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b715d93 into rust-lang:master Feb 7, 2024
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120746 - compiler-errors:kind-ty, r=oli-obk

Record coroutine kind in coroutine generics

Oops, added a new substitution (the "kind" ty) to coroutines but forgot to record it in the `generics_of`. I'm surprised I left this out of the coroutine-closure PR -- I thought I made this change; I possibly rebased it out by accident.

Fixes rust-lang#120732

r? oli-obk
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ice: coroutine constructed with incorrect number of substitutions
4 participants