Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix fn/const items implied bounds and wf check (rebase) #120019

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 17, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
wf-check type annotations before normalization
  • Loading branch information
aliemjay authored and lcnr committed Jan 16, 2024
commit aac2f84794d3122216e07a5a6b00b6facf5e9f16
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -63,13 63,16 @@ fn relate_mir_and_user_ty<'tcx>(
user_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
let cause = ObligationCause::dummy_with_span(span);
ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(
ocx.infcx.tcx,
cause.clone(),
param_env,
ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(user_ty.into()),
));

let user_ty = ocx.normalize(&cause, param_env, user_ty);
ocx.eq(&cause, param_env, mir_ty, user_ty)?;

// FIXME(#104764): We should check well-formedness before normalization.
let predicate =
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(user_ty.into())));
ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(ocx.infcx.tcx, cause, param_env, predicate));
Ok(())
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -113,31 116,38 @@ fn relate_mir_and_user_args<'tcx>(
ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(tcx, cause, param_env, instantiated_predicate));
}

// Now prove the well-formedness of `def_id` with `substs`.
// Note for some items, proving the WF of `ty` is not sufficient because the
// well-formedness of an item may depend on the WF of gneneric args not present in the
// item's type. Currently this is true for associated consts, e.g.:
// ```rust
// impl<T> MyTy<T> {
// const CONST: () = { /* arbitrary code that depends on T being WF */ };
// }
// ```
for arg in args {
ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(
tcx,
cause.clone(),
param_env,
ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(arg),
));
}

if let Some(UserSelfTy { impl_def_id, self_ty }) = user_self_ty {
ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(
tcx,
cause.clone(),
param_env,
ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(self_ty.into()),
));

let self_ty = ocx.normalize(&cause, param_env, self_ty);
let impl_self_ty = tcx.type_of(impl_def_id).instantiate(tcx, args);
let impl_self_ty = ocx.normalize(&cause, param_env, impl_self_ty);

ocx.eq(&cause, param_env, self_ty, impl_self_ty)?;
let predicate = ty::Binder::dummy(ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(
impl_self_ty.into(),
)));
ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(tcx, cause.clone(), param_env, predicate));
}

// In addition to proving the predicates, we have to
// prove that `ty` is well-formed -- this is because
// the WF of `ty` is predicated on the args being
// well-formed, and we haven't proven *that*. We don't
// want to prove the WF of types from `args` directly because they
// haven't been normalized.
//
// FIXME(nmatsakis): Well, perhaps we should normalize
// them? This would only be relevant if some input
// type were ill-formed but did not appear in `ty`,
// which...could happen with normalization...
let predicate =
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(ty.into())));
ocx.register_obligation(Obligation::new(tcx, cause, param_env, predicate));
Ok(())
}
9 changes: 4 additions & 5 deletions tests/ui/wf/wf-associated-const.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,8 1,5 @@
// check that associated consts can assume the impl header is well-formed.

// FIXME(aliemjay): we should check the impl header is WF at the use site
// but we currently don't in some cases. This is *unsound*.

trait Foo<'a, 'b, T>: Sized {
const EVIL: fn(u: &'b u32) -> &'a u32;
}
Expand All @@ -27,11 24,13 @@ impl<'a, 'b> Evil<'a, 'b> {
// *check* that it holds at the use site.

fn evil<'a, 'b>(b: &'b u32) -> &'a u32 {
<()>::EVIL(b) // FIXME: should be an error
<()>::EVIL(b)
//~^ ERROR lifetime may not live long enough
}

fn indirect_evil<'a, 'b>(b: &'b u32) -> &'a u32 {
<IndirectEvil>::EVIL(b) // FIXME: should be an error
<IndirectEvil>::EVIL(b)
//~^ ERROR lifetime may not live long enough
}

fn inherent_evil<'a, 'b>(b: &'b u32) -> &'a u32 {
Expand Down
28 changes: 26 additions & 2 deletions tests/ui/wf/wf-associated-const.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 1,29 @@
error: lifetime may not live long enough
--> $DIR/wf-associated-const.rs:38:5
--> $DIR/wf-associated-const.rs:27:5
|
LL | fn evil<'a, 'b>(b: &'b u32) -> &'a u32 {
| -- -- lifetime `'b` defined here
| |
| lifetime `'a` defined here
LL | <()>::EVIL(b)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ function was supposed to return data with lifetime `'a` but it is returning data with lifetime `'b`
|
= help: consider adding the following bound: `'b: 'a`

error: lifetime may not live long enough
--> $DIR/wf-associated-const.rs:32:5
|
LL | fn indirect_evil<'a, 'b>(b: &'b u32) -> &'a u32 {
| -- -- lifetime `'b` defined here
| |
| lifetime `'a` defined here
LL | <IndirectEvil>::EVIL(b)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ function was supposed to return data with lifetime `'a` but it is returning data with lifetime `'b`
|
= help: consider adding the following bound: `'b: 'a`

error: lifetime may not live long enough
--> $DIR/wf-associated-const.rs:37:5
|
LL | fn inherent_evil<'a, 'b>(b: &'b u32) -> &'a u32 {
| -- -- lifetime `'b` defined here
Expand All @@ -10,5 34,5 @@ LL | <Evil>::INHERENT_EVIL(b)
|
= help: consider adding the following bound: `'b: 'a`

error: aborting due to previous error
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors