Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only check outlives goals on impl compared to trait #109356

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2023

Conversation

jackh726
Copy link
Member

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 19, 2023
@jackh726
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 19, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 19, 2023

⌛ Trying commit 7760182c6632aee71f02847169d13607b4b19b64 with merge 6979a2ddb0b3863e3bb078e1b252b5959c54be65...

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approach looks fine to me, one nit. let's see what perf says.

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/compare_impl_item.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 19, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 6979a2ddb0b3863e3bb078e1b252b5959c54be65 (6979a2ddb0b3863e3bb078e1b252b5959c54be65)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (6979a2ddb0b3863e3bb078e1b252b5959c54be65): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.2% [1.2%, 1.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.9% [-1.4%, -0.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.9% [-1.4%, -0.3%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.9% [0.4%, 1.1%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.9% [3.9%, 3.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.1% [-2.5%, -0.4%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.1% [-2.5%, 1.1%] 6

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.6% [0.5%, 0.7%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.5% [-0.6%, -0.4%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.0% [-0.6%, 0.7%] 6

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 19, 2023
@jackh726
Copy link
Member Author

Had to add FxHashSet because of infinite cycle. Let's recheck perf.

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 19, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 19, 2023

⌛ Trying commit eadcd271de548dc676c928e1562021d281ed9584 with merge 6df34432f4d6a6382a2434b3976482ce6e7fb836...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 6df34432f4d6a6382a2434b3976482ce6e7fb836 (6df34432f4d6a6382a2434b3976482ce6e7fb836)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (6df34432f4d6a6382a2434b3976482ce6e7fb836): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.4%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.1% [-1.2%, -0.9%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-1.2%, 0.4%] 4

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.7% [0.7%, 0.7%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.0% [-1.2%, -0.8%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-1.2%, 0.7%] 3

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.2% [-1.2%, -1.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-1.2%, 0.5%] 2

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Mar 20, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I think this is noise -- anyways, this is also for correctness.

@bors r

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2023

📌 Commit eadcd271de548dc676c928e1562021d281ed9584 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 21, 2023
// we pick param env candidates over a more general impl, leading to more
// stricter lifetime requirements than we would otherwise need. This can
// trigger the lint. Instead, let's only consider type outlives and
// region outlives obligations.
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr Mar 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should be unsound?

for some argument to be well formed, we could have a trait obligation with a nested outlives constraint which only holds because of the implied bounds of the method?

i could imagine only checking the outlives bounds returned by https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/ty/context/struct.TyCtxt.html#method.implied_outlives_bounds, but even that feels dangerous.

I don't think we should keep an unsoundness to patch a deficiency of the current trait solver, especially if that deficiency can be solved in a different way.

Can we instead strip trivial clauses from the trait method param env when substituting? That should solve this issue without adding any soundness concerns? 🤔

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

opened #109491 to experiment with that approach

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is unsound (though, arguably, imperfect).

We check that everything is well formed elsewhere, so there's no unsoundness related to ill-formed types.

The only implied bounds we currently have are those involving regions (or super trait bounds, but those should also be checked elsewhere).

Therefore, we don't necessarily have to care about non-region predicates for this lint.

That being said, while in theory, skipping "trivial clauses" is arguably a "nicer" solution, the implementation in #109491 is not simple. And I think that approach may also have issues when the param env predicates introduce ambiguity that doesn't exist in an empty environment. Though, I'm not sure if this would be caught by other checks.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is unsound (though, arguably, imperfect).

We check that everything is well formed elsewhere, so there's no unsoundness related to ill-formed types.

The only implied bounds we currently have are those involving regions (or super trait bounds, but those should also be checked elsewhere).

Therefore, we don't necessarily have to care about non-region predicates for this lint.

We do care about them if these other predicates end up causing us to add additional outlives predicates. Considering that we end up computing Projection obligations inside of compute_implied_outlives_bounds, this can be the case.

if obligation.predicate.has_non_region_infer() {
match obligation.predicate.kind().skip_binder() {
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::Clause::Projection(..))
| ty::PredicateKind::AliasRelate(..) => {
ocx.register_obligation(obligation.clone());
}
_ => {}
}
}

That being said, while in theory, skipping "trivial clauses" is arguably a "nicer" solution, the implementation in #109491 is not simple.

I disagree, the implementation in #109491 is (after enabling the use of the canonical solver mode to get non-fatal overflow) simple. We're checking whether a goal holds in an empty environment. While this needs more lines of code, the behavior of these is clear and also relied on in other areas of the compiler. That approach is also far more obvious to be sound as we don't drop requirements, we only drop assumptions.

And I think that approach may also have issues when the param env predicates introduce ambiguity that doesn't exist in an empty environment. Though, I'm not sure if this would be caught by other checks.

You mean that the approach in #109491 does not completely fix the issue of incorrect ambiguity/selecting the wrong candidate when proving the wf bounds? That is true and something that can be incrementally improved if people encounter that issue .

I very strongly prefer trivially sound (given that the rest of the trait solver is sound) over maybe sound but may accept slightly more code.

I've spend a few hours looking at the code and experimenting with some tests to convince myself that your approach is sound (or to get a counter example) and wasn't able to do either of these. Apparently removing the ocx.register_obligation doesn't actually break any existing tests but an assertion that the obligation has no inference variables does fail. cc @aliemjay as you may know whether that register_obligation is currently still needed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do care about them if these other predicates end up causing us to add additional outlives predicates. Considering that we end up computing Projection obligations inside of compute_implied_outlives_bounds, this can be the case.

In implied_outlives_bounds query, ocx.register_obligations will add additional predicates as requirements not assumptions. i.e. the additional outlives predicates will end up in QueryResponse::region_constraints rather than QueryResponse::value.

Apparently removing the ocx.register_obligation doesn't actually break any existing tests but an assertion that the obligation has no inference variables does fail. cc @aliemjay as you may know whether that register_obligation is currently still needed.

After fiddling with it for a while I managed to come up with a test:

pub trait Iter {
    type Item;
}

impl<X, I> Iter for I
where
    I: IntoIterator<Item = X>,
{
    type Item = X;
}

pub struct Map<I>(I)
where
    I: Iter,
    I::Item: 'static;

fn test<X>(_: Map<Vec<X>>) {}

and filed an issue #109799 for why the condition predicate.has_non_region_infer() is unnecessary.

Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr Apr 20, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extending the approach in #109491 to deal with generic bounds ended up causing weird trait solver errors so I changed my opinion here. I think that - at least with the current solver - this PR is the better choice.

Please add the following as a test.

// check-pass

// Similar to issue-108544.rs except that we have a generic `T` which
// previously caused an overeager fast-path to trigger.
use std::borrow::Cow;

pub trait Trait<T: Clone> {
    fn method(self) -> Option<Cow<'static, T>>
    where
        Self: Sized;
}

impl<'a, T: Clone> Trait<T> for Cow<'a, T> {
    fn method(self) -> Option<Cow<'static, T>> {
        None
    }
}

fn main() {}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also please add a fixme to look into reverting this once the new solver is stable

Suggested change
// region outlives obligations.
// region outlives obligations.
//
// FIXME(-Ztrait-solver=next): Try removing this hack again once
// the new solver is stable.

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Mar 22, 2023

@bors r- for now because of the above comment

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 22, 2023
@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label May 25, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@jackh726: Are you planning on rebasing this? Ideally we'd bump deny implied_bounds_entailment to a hard error, but I think it's blocked on this.

(cc #105572 for tracking)

@jackh726
Copy link
Member Author

Ah yes. Completely forgot about this

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jackh726
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 12, 2023

📌 Commit 3028dc4 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 12, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 12, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 3028dc4 with merge f1b8548...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 12, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lcnr
Pushing f1b8548 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 12, 2023
@bors bors merged commit f1b8548 into rust-lang:master Aug 12, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Aug 12, 2023
@rust-timer

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Aug 12, 2023

The result above was caused by an issue in the perf. bot, it doesn't have anything to do with this PR. Sorry for the noise.

@rustbot label: perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Aug 12, 2023
@rust-timer

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rustbot rustbot removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label Aug 12, 2023
@jackh726 jackh726 deleted the issue-108544 branch August 12, 2023 14:33
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f1b8548): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.9% [-1.6%, -0.6%] 6
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.9% [-1.6%, -0.6%] 6

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7% [-2.7%, -2.7%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.0% [3.9%, 4.1%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 632.009s -> 632.973s (0.15%)

@Skepfyr
Copy link
Contributor

Skepfyr commented Aug 13, 2023

This looks like it's causing ICEs on the latest nightly: #114783

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

  • regression is solely to the opt and debug profiles externs secondary benchmark, by a small amount.
  • marked as triaged

@rustbot label: perf-regression-triaged

(those ICEs from issue #114783 might lead us to revert this though.)

wip-sync pushed a commit to NetBSD/pkgsrc-wip that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2023
Language
--------

- [Uplift `clippy::fn_null_check` lint as `useless_ptr_null_checks`.]
  (rust-lang/rust#111717)
- [Make `noop_method_call` warn by default.]
  (rust-lang/rust#111916)
- [Support interpolated block for `try` and `async` in macros.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112953)
- [Make `unconditional_recursion` lint detect recursive drops.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113902)
- [Future compatibility warning for some impls being incorrectly
  considered not overlapping.]
  (rust-lang/rust#114023)
- [The `invalid_reference_casting` lint is now **deny-by-default**
  (instead of allow-by-default)]
  (rust-lang/rust#112431)

Compiler
--------

- [Write version information in a `.comment` section like GCC/Clang.]
  (rust-lang/rust#97550)
- [Add documentation on v0 symbol mangling.]
  (rust-lang/rust#97571)
- [Stabilize `extern "thiscall"` and `"thiscall-unwind"` ABIs.]
  (rust-lang/rust#114562)
- [Only check outlives goals on impl compared to trait.]
  (rust-lang/rust#109356)
- [Infer type in irrefutable slice patterns with fixed length as array.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113199)
- [Discard default auto trait impls if explicit ones exist.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113312)
- Add several new tier 3 targets:
    - [`aarch64-unknown-teeos`]
      (rust-lang/rust#113480)
    - [`csky-unknown-linux-gnuabiv2`]
      (rust-lang/rust#113658)
    - [`riscv64-linux-android`]
      (rust-lang/rust#112858)
    - [`riscv64gc-unknown-hermit`]
      (rust-lang/rust#114004)
    - [`x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl`]
      (rust-lang/rust#113411)
    - [`x86_64-unknown-linux-ohos`]
      (rust-lang/rust#113061)
- [Add `wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads` as a tier 2 target.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112922)

Refer to Rust's [platform support page][platform-support-doc]
for more information on Rust's tiered platform support.

Libraries
---------

- [Add `Read`, `Write` and `Seek` impls for `Arc<File>`.]
  (rust-lang/rust#94748)
- [Merge functionality of `io::Sink` into `io::Empty`.]
  (rust-lang/rust#98154)
- [Implement `RefUnwindSafe` for `Backtrace`]
  (rust-lang/rust#100455)
- [Make `ExitStatus` implement `Default`]
  (rust-lang/rust#106425)
- [`impl SliceIndex<str> for (Bound<usize>, Bound<usize>)`]
  (rust-lang/rust#111081)
- [Change default panic handler message format.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112849)
- [Cleaner `assert_eq!` & `assert_ne!` panic messages.]
  (rust-lang/rust#111071)
- [Correct the (deprecated) Android `stat` struct definitions.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113130)

Stabilized APIs
---------------

- [Unsigned `{integer}::div_ceil`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.div_ceil)
- [Unsigned `{integer}::next_multiple_of`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.next_multiple_of)
- [Unsigned `{integer}::checked_next_multiple_of`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.checked_next_multiple_of)
- [`std::ffi::FromBytesUntilNulError`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ffi/struct.FromBytesUntilNulError.html)
- [`std::os::unix::fs::chown`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/fs/fn.chown.html)
- [`std::os::unix::fs::fchown`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/fs/fn.fchown.html)
- [`std::os::unix::fs::lfchown`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/fs/fn.lchown.html)
- [`LocalKey::<Cell<T>>::get`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.get)
- [`LocalKey::<Cell<T>>::set`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.set)
- [`LocalKey::<Cell<T>>::take`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.take)
- [`LocalKey::<Cell<T>>::replace`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.replace)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::with_borrow`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.with_borrow)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::with_borrow_mut`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.with_borrow_mut)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::set`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.set-1)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::take`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.take-1)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::replace`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.replace-1)

These APIs are now stable in const contexts:

- [`rc::Weak::new`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/alloc/rc/struct.Weak.html#method.new)
- [`sync::Weak::new`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/alloc/sync/struct.Weak.html#method.new)
- [`NonNull::as_ref`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/ptr/struct.NonNull.html#method.as_ref)

Cargo
-----

- [Encode URL params correctly for `SourceId` in `Cargo.lock`.]
  (rust-lang/cargo#12280)
- [Bail out an error when using `cargo::` in custom build script.]
  (rust-lang/cargo#12332)

Compatibility Notes
-------------------

- [Update the minimum external LLVM to 15.]
  (rust-lang/rust#114148)
- [Check for non-defining uses of return position `impl Trait`.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112842)

Internal Changes
----------------

These changes do not affect any public interfaces of Rust, but they represent
significant improvements to the performance or internals of rustc and related
tools.

- [Remove LLVM pointee types, supporting only opaque pointers.]
  (rust-lang/rust#105545)
- [Port PGO/LTO/BOLT optimized build pipeline to Rust.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112235)
- [Replace in-tree `rustc_apfloat` with the new version of the crate.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113843)
- [Update to LLVM 17.]
  (rust-lang/rust#114048)
- [Add `internal_features` lint for internal unstable features.]
  (rust-lang/rust#108955)
- [Mention style for new syntax in tracking issue template.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113586)
netbsd-srcmastr pushed a commit to NetBSD/pkgsrc that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Pkgsrc changes:
 * Adjust patches and cargo checksums to new versions.
 * For an external LLVM, set dependency of llvm >= 15, in accordance
   with the upstream changes.
 * Add a patch with a backport from LLVM 17.0.3 fixing codegen for
   PPC, ref. rust-lang/rust#116845

Upstream changes:

Version 1.73.0 (2023-10-05)
==========================

Language
--------

- [Uplift `clippy::fn_null_check` lint as `useless_ptr_null_checks`.]
  (rust-lang/rust#111717)
- [Make `noop_method_call` warn by default.]
  (rust-lang/rust#111916)
- [Support interpolated block for `try` and `async` in macros.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112953)
- [Make `unconditional_recursion` lint detect recursive drops.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113902)
- [Future compatibility warning for some impls being incorrectly
  considered not overlapping.]
  (rust-lang/rust#114023)
- [The `invalid_reference_casting` lint is now **deny-by-default**
  (instead of allow-by-default)]
  (rust-lang/rust#112431

Compiler
--------

- [Write version information in a `.comment` section like GCC/Clang.]
  (rust-lang/rust#97550)
- [Add documentation on v0 symbol mangling.]
  (rust-lang/rust#97571)
- [Stabilize `extern "thiscall"` and `"thiscall-unwind"` ABIs.]
  (rust-lang/rust#114562)
- [Only check outlives goals on impl compared to trait.]
  (rust-lang/rust#109356)
- [Infer type in irrefutable slice patterns with fixed length as array.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113199)
- [Discard default auto trait impls if explicit ones exist.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113312)
- Add several new tier 3 targets:
    - [`aarch64-unknown-teeos`]
      (rust-lang/rust#113480)
    - [`csky-unknown-linux-gnuabiv2`]
      (rust-lang/rust#113658)
    - [`riscv64-linux-android`]
      (rust-lang/rust#112858)
    - [`riscv64gc-unknown-hermit`]
      (rust-lang/rust#114004)
    - [`x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl`]
      (rust-lang/rust#113411)
    - [`x86_64-unknown-linux-ohos`]
      (rust-lang/rust#113061)
- [Add `wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads` as a tier 2 target.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112922)

Refer to Rust's [platform support page][platform-support-doc]
for more information on Rust's tiered platform support.

Libraries
---------

- [Add `Read`, `Write` and `Seek` impls for `Arc<File>`.]
  (rust-lang/rust#94748)
- [Merge functionality of `io::Sink` into `io::Empty`.]
  (rust-lang/rust#98154)
- [Implement `RefUnwindSafe` for `Backtrace`]
  (rust-lang/rust#100455)
- [Make `ExitStatus` implement `Default`]
  (rust-lang/rust#106425)
- [`impl SliceIndex<str> for (Bound<usize>, Bound<usize>)`]
  (rust-lang/rust#111081)
- [Change default panic handler message format.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112849)
- [Cleaner `assert_eq!` & `assert_ne!` panic messages.]
  (rust-lang/rust#111071)
- [Correct the (deprecated) Android `stat` struct definitions.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113130)

Stabilized APIs
---------------

- [Unsigned `{integer}::div_ceil`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitiv e.u32.html#method.div_ceil)
- [Unsigned `{integer}::next_multiple_of`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.next_multiple_of)
- [Unsigned `{integer}::checked_next_multiple_of`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.checked_next_multiple_of)
- [`std::ffi::FromBytesUntilNulError`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ffi/struct.FromBytesUntilNulError.html)
- [`std::os::unix::fs::chown`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/fs/fn.chown.html)
- [`std::os::unix::fs::fchown`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/fs/fn.fchown.html)
- [`std::os::unix::fs::lfchown`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/fs/fn.lchown.html)
- [`LocalKey::<Cell<T>>::get`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.get)
- [`LocalKey::<Cell<T>>::set`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.set)
- [`LocalKey::<Cell<T>>::take`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.take)
- [`LocalKey::<Cell<T>>::replace`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.replace)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::with_borrow`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.with_borrow)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::with_borrow_mut`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.with_borrow_mut)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::set`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.set-1)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::take`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.take-1)
- [`LocalKey::<RefCell<T>>::replace`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/struct.LocalKey.html#method.replace-1)

These APIs are now stable in const contexts:

- [`rc::Weak::new`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/alloc/rc/struct.Weak.html#method.new)
- [`sync::Weak::new`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/alloc/sync/struct.Weak.html#method.new)
- [`NonNull::as_ref`]
  (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/ptr/struct.NonNull.html#method.as_ref)

Cargo
-----

- [Encode URL params correctly for `SourceId` in `Cargo.lock`.]
  (rust-lang/cargo#12280)
- [Bail out an error when using `cargo::` in custom build script.]
  (rust-lang/cargo#12332)

Misc
----

Compatibility Notes
-------------------

- [Update the minimum external LLVM to 15.]
  (rust-lang/rust#114148)
- [Check for non-defining uses of return position `impl Trait`.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112842)

Internal Changes
----------------

These changes do not affect any public interfaces of Rust, but they
represent significant improvements to the performance or internals
of rustc and related tools.

- [Remove LLVM pointee types, supporting only opaque pointers.]
  (rust-lang/rust#105545)
- [Port PGO/LTO/BOLT optimized build pipeline to Rust.]
  (rust-lang/rust#112235)
- [Replace in-tree `rustc_apfloat` with the new version of the crate.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113843)
- [Update to LLVM 17.]
  (rust-lang/rust#114048)
- [Add `internal_features` lint for internal unstable features.]
  (rust-lang/rust#108955)
- [Mention style for new syntax in tracking issue template.]
  (rust-lang/rust#113586)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-types Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

false positive implied_bounds_entailment lint