Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip test on s390x as LLD does not support the platform #105385

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2022

Conversation

uweigand
Copy link
Contributor

@uweigand uweigand commented Dec 6, 2022

test/run-make/issue-71519 requires use of lld as linker, but lld does not currently support the s390x architecture.

test/run-make/issue-71519 requires use of lld as linker,
but lld does not currently support the s390x architecture.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 6, 2022

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 6, 2022
@uweigand
Copy link
Contributor Author

uweigand commented Dec 6, 2022

Fixes part of #105383 .

@@ -2,6 2,7 @@ include ../../run-make-fulldeps/tools.mk

# ignore-msvc
# needs-rust-lld
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this not covered by needs-rust-lld? If lld does not support s390x, we probably shouldn't be shipping a rust-lld either?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I guess having rust-lld can still make sense for cross-compiling.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exactly. Specifically for linking wasm binaries, where lld is really the only option.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 8, 2022

📌 Commit 17766c1 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 8, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102406 (Make `missing_copy_implementations` more cautious)
 - rust-lang#105265 (Add `rustc_on_unimplemented` to `Sum` and `Product` trait.)
 - rust-lang#105385 (Skip test on s390x as LLD does not support the platform)
 - rust-lang#105453 (Make `VecDeque::from_iter` O(1) from `vec(_deque)::IntoIter`)
 - rust-lang#105468 (Mangle "main" as "__main_void" on wasm32-wasi)
 - rust-lang#105480 (rustdoc: remove no-op mobile CSS `#sidebar-toggle { text-align }`)
 - rust-lang#105489 (Fix typo in apple_base.rs)
 - rust-lang#105504 (rustdoc: make stability badge CSS more consistent)
 - rust-lang#105506 (Tweak `rustc_must_implement_one_of` diagnostic output)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c44326e into rust-lang:master Dec 10, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 10, 2022
@uweigand uweigand deleted the s390x-test-lld branch December 10, 2022 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants