-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Panic in Receiver::recv() #39364
Comments
@jamespharaoh do you have a standalone example for example that could be |
I've attempted to recreate this in a simple piece of code but haven't had any success, will keep trying, but perhaps someone can give me some advice... I have a feeling this bug might be in some other synchronization that's going on, since I'm only creating one Sender and one Receiver, then the sender is passed around behind an So it seems to me that somehow if part of the functionality to do that is not correctly synchronizing the state as this is cloned, locked, unlocked, and sent between threads, then it could certainly produce incorrect behaviour in the I am also using various C libraries etc but it seems unlikely that a problem with those would so reliably cause an error in the same place. Does this also seem reasonable? |
Yeah if there's other unsafe code that may be something to take a look at as well, but otherwise we haven't seen a segfault in channels in a very long time so nothing jumps to mind unfortunately :( |
The other unsafe code is just compression libraries linked in, well trusted and heavily used, and accessed in a very threadsafe way. And despite lots of concurrency they work flawlessly - the only error I am seeing is always this same receiver issue. My next experiment to reproduce it will add in another element from the app where i see the problem, which is your |
Note that #40156 is similar to this so that makes me pretty confident it's not the fault of your local unsafe code. @jamespharaoh did you get anywhere with more investigation? |
I haven't had a chance but will try soon. |
I have a similar problem. at /checkout/src/libstd/sys/unix/backtrace/tracing/gcc_s.rs:49
1: 0x56287ebb9a54 - std::sys_common::backtrace::_print::hd8a1b72dcf3955ef
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys_common/backtrace.rs:71
2: 0x56287ebc149c - std::panicking::default_hook::{{closure}}::h5ff605bba7612658
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys_common/backtrace.rs:60
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:355
3: 0x56287ebc1064 - std::panicking::default_hook::h9bc4f6dfee57d6bd
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:371
4: 0x56287ebc18eb - std::panicking::rust_panic_with_hook::hdc01585dc2bf7122
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:549
5: 0x56287ebc17c4 - std::panicking::begin_panic::hf84f4975d9f9b642
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:511
6: 0x56287ebc16f9 - std::panicking::begin_panic_fmt::hcc3f360b2ba80419
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:495
7: 0x56287e3cbbc6 - <std::sync::mpsc::shared::Packet<T>>::decrement::he4fa9520181c5c85
at /checkout/src/libstd/macros.rs:51
8: 0x56287e3c806f - <std::sync::mpsc::shared::Packet<T>>::recv::h3c95f5bc336537aa
at /checkout/src/libstd/sync/mpsc/shared.rs:232
9: 0x56287e3ad379 - <std::sync::mpsc::Receiver<T>>::recv_max_until::h950909094e0767d9
at /checkout/src/libstd/sync/mpsc/mod.rs:966
10: 0x56287e3acc85 - <std::sync::mpsc::Receiver<T>>::recv_timeout::hf72a64a0530efaa1
at /checkout/src/libstd/sync/mpsc/mod.rs:940
11: 0x56287e466841 - <mould_extension::ConnectExtensionWorker as mould::worker::Worker<T>>::realize::hf8b7190433e70336
at /home/denis/vxrevenue/cloud/sub/mould-extension/src/lib.rs:129
12: 0x56287e41cd77 - mould::server::process_session::{{closure}}::h0572e63ea7bd3be9
at /home/denis/vxrevenue/cloud/sub/mould/src/server.rs:83
13: 0x56287e41b69a - mould::server::process_session::h54610d99cf99088f
at /home/denis/vxrevenue/cloud/sub/mould/src/server.rs:44
14: 0x56287e41f76b - mould::server::wsmould::start::{{closure}}::hb36d2fb80ee5ded6
at /home/denis/vxrevenue/cloud/sub/mould/src/server.rs:272
15: 0x56287e469345 - <std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<F> as core::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once::h8ef904bc75108aeb
at /checkout/src/libstd/panic.rs:296
16: 0x56287e3a2e7a - std::panicking::try::do_call::h0979d3031b45f486
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:454
17: 0x56287ebc897a - __rust_maybe_catch_panic
at /checkout/src/libpanic_unwind/lib.rs:98
18: 0x56287e3a26de - std::panicking::try::h42b9334978084c46
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:433
19: 0x56287e39d4a3 - std::panic::catch_unwind::h5ea213ef0eb7edd1
at /checkout/src/libstd/panic.rs:361
20: 0x56287e3a1a86 - std::thread::Builder::spawn::{{closure}}::h1288ffa1c4d83635
at /checkout/src/libstd/thread/mod.rs:360
21: 0x56287e3fca66 - <F as alloc::boxed::FnBox<A>>::call_box::h1b125a486a246990
at /checkout/src/liballoc/boxed.rs:640
22: 0x56287ebc0714 - std::sys::imp::thread::Thread::new::thread_start::h75b208405df6dcf1
at /checkout/src/liballoc/boxed.rs:650
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys_common/thread.rs:21
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys/unix/thread.rs:84
23: 0x7f7d554096c9 - start_thread
24: 0x7f7d54f2cf7e - clone
25: 0x0 - <unknown> |
Maybe it's important: thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
(left: `140664964694432`, right: `0`)', /checkout/src/libstd/sync/mpsc/shared.rs:503 https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/std/sync/mpsc/shared.rs.html#503 impl<T> Drop for Packet<T> {
fn drop(&mut self) {
// Note that this load is not only an assert for correctness about
// disconnection, but also a proper fence before the read of
// `to_wake`, so this assert cannot be removed with also removing
// the `to_wake` assert.
assert_eq!(self.cnt.load(Ordering::SeqCst), DISCONNECTED);
/*503*/ assert_eq!(self.to_wake.load(Ordering::SeqCst), 0);
assert_eq!(self.channels.load(Ordering::SeqCst), 0);
}
} |
Not only one thread panics. Other thread panics here: fn decrement(&self, token: SignalToken) -> StartResult {
unsafe {
/*253*/ assert_eq!(self.to_wake.load(Ordering::SeqCst), 0);
let ptr = token.cast_to_usize();
self.to_wake.store(ptr, Ordering::SeqCst); |
Hi @alexcrichton, I've made an example which often fails and sometimes panic! on receive:
To approve it panics I include trace I've taken: thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)` (left: `140671335870496`, right: `0`)', /checkout/src/libstd/sync/mpsc/shared.rs:253
note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'sending request: "SendError(..)"', /checkout/src/libcore/result.rs:859
thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Any', /checkout/src/libcore/result.rs:859 Sometimes it even loses messages and can be blocked. I hope it helps... |
I've improved logging to make sure that the messages sends correctly. I saw a regularity: it brokes when sender instance moved (it transfers owning of the only one instance of DEBUG:rfail: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DEBUG:rfail: >>>>> 716 >>>>>
DEBUG:rfail: 716 - found : 0
DEBUG:rfail: 716 - request -> 0
DEBUG:rfail: 716 - response <- 0
DEBUG:rfail: 716 - found : 1
DEBUG:rfail: 716 - request -> 1
DEBUG:rfail: 716 - response <- 1
DEBUG:rfail: 716 - found : 2
DEBUG:rfail: 716 - request -> 2
DEBUG:rfail: 716 - response <- 2
DEBUG:rfail: <<<<< 716 <<<<<
DEBUG:rfail: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DEBUG:rfail: >>>>> 717 >>>>>
DEBUG:rfail: 717 - found : 0
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)` (left: `139883544888960`, right: `0`)', /checkout/src/libstd/sync/mpsc/shared.rs:253
note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'receive result: RecvError', /checkout/src/libcore/result.rs:859
thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Any', /checkout/src/libcore/result.rs:859 Any ideas how can I detect, catch and debug it? |
@deniskolodin awesome thanks so much for the recent investigation into this! The failure here I believe is specifically happening with Locally I was unable to reproduce with It'd be great if you could help out investigating libstd in this regard, but I'll try to get around to taking a look too soon. |
@alexcrichton I've checked it again with your suggestions. You are absolutely right: this bug appeared with |
FWIW, I've reduced @deniskolodin example to simpler one:
In debug build it usually results in one of two assertions in 1000 iterations on my macbook. |
Previous version had too much state: `cnt`, `steals`, `port_dropped` fields, and it's too hard to consistently update all of them during upgrade. I tried to fix issue rust-lang#39364, but there are too many corner cases. In this version all of these fields removed, and shared state is basically managed by two fields: `queue` and `to_wait`. `to_wake` field now stores both `SignalToken` and "disconnected" flag. All tests still pass, and bug rust-lang#39364 no longer reproduces. Patch includes a couple of stress tests. This version should have the same performance characteristics, because roughly the same number of atomics and wait/notify operations involved.
I ran into the same problem. Here's a even easier example how to trigger the bug: use std::sync::mpsc::channel;
use std::thread;
use std::time::Duration;
fn main() {
let (tx, rx) = channel::<String>();
thread::spawn(move || {
let d = Duration::from_millis(10);
loop {
println!("recv");
let _r = rx.recv_timeout(d);
}
});
thread::sleep(Duration::from_millis(100));
let _c1 = tx.clone();
thread::sleep(Duration::from_secs(1));
} |
It will conditionally panic due to this issue: rust-lang/rust#39364 The issue is not fixed yet, so I try to use alternative ways (e.g. try_recv & sleep). It will cause some performance penalty in theory, but not noticable by human(for now).
The recv_timeout function panics due to this issue: rust-lang/rust#39364 Using try_recv and a short sleep in case the channel is empty should be suitable alternative for our use case.
@imnotbad ran into the same issue with a GTK project. I reduced the problem and investigated it. My reproduction case can be found in this playpen. The problem is the following: rust/src/libstd/sync/mpsc/mod.rs Lines 871 to 876 in 7360d6d
This results in the wake_token to be removed from the rust/src/libstd/sync/mpsc/shared.rs Lines 251 to 253 in 7360d6d
My idea for a solution to the problem would be to remove the inheritage of the wake_token from the sender side. Instead after the sender has performed the upgrade, it should wake up the receiver, which cleans the signal_token, upgrades itself and registers a new signal_token. rust/src/libstd/sync/mpsc/shared.rs Lines 100 to 128 in 7360d6d
|
cf. rust-lang/rust#39364 Also take this opportunity to centralize the expect threads.
Reading through this ticket, I strongly recommend that If #93563 is going to be merged instead then fine, but there hasn't been any discussion of that since February. |
One alternative to |
On Apple Silicon, we were hitting a concurrency error that manifest with recv() panicking like this: thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'internal error: entered unreachable code' Seems to be a known issue rust-lang/rust#39364 Follow the recommendation on the thread, and switch from mpsc (which seems its going to be retired) to crossbeam-channel. Signed-off-by: Sergio Lopez <[email protected]>
On Apple Silicon, we were hitting a concurrency error that manifest with recv() panicking like this: thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'internal error: entered unreachable code' Seems to be a known issue rust-lang/rust#39364 Follow the recommendation on the thread, and switch from mpsc (which seems its going to be retired) to crossbeam-channel. Signed-off-by: Sergio Lopez <[email protected]>
On Apple Silicon, we were hitting a concurrency error that manifest with recv() panicking like this: thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'internal error: entered unreachable code' Seems to be a known issue rust-lang/rust#39364 Follow the recommendation on the thread, and switch from mpsc (which seems its going to be retired) to crossbeam-channel. Signed-off-by: Sergio Lopez <[email protected]>
On Apple Silicon, we were hitting a concurrency error that manifest with recv() panicking like this: thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'internal error: entered unreachable code' Seems to be a known issue rust-lang/rust#39364 Follow the recommendation on the thread, and switch from mpsc (which seems its going to be retired) to crossbeam-channel. Signed-off-by: Sergio Lopez <[email protected]>
On Apple Silicon, we were hitting a concurrency error that manifest with recv() panicking like this: thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'internal error: entered unreachable code' Seems to be a known issue rust-lang/rust#39364 Follow the recommendation on the thread, and switch from mpsc (which seems its going to be retired) to crossbeam-channel. Signed-off-by: Sergio Lopez <[email protected]>
v8.5.2 Bugfixes - Fix --owner option value parsing, see #1163 and #1164 (@tmccombs) v8.5.1 Bugfixes - Fix --threads/-j option value parsing, see #1160 and #1162 (@sharkdp) v8.5.0 Features --type executable/-t now works on Windows, see #1051 and #1061 (@tavianator) Bugfixes - Fixed differences between piped / non-piped output. This changes fds behavior back to what we had before 8.3.0, i.e. there will be no leading ./ prefixes, unless --exec/-x, --exec-batch/-X, or --print0/-0 are used. --strip-cwd-prefix can be used to strip that prefix in those cases. See #1046, #1115, and #1121 (@tavianator) - fd could previously crash with a panic due to a race condition in Rusts standard library (see rust-lang/rust#39364). This has been fixed by switching to a different message passing implementation, see #1060 and #1146 (@tavianator) - fds memory usage will not grow unboundedly on huge directory trees, see #1146 (@tavianator) - fd returns an error when current working directory does not exist while a search path is specified, see #1072 (@vijfhoek) - Improved "command not found" error message, see #1083 and #1109 (@themkat) - Preserve command exit codes when using --exec-batch, see #1136 and #1137 (@amesgen) Changes - No leading ./ prefix for non-interactive results, see above. - fd now colorizes paths in parallel, significantly improving performance, see #1148 (@tavianator) - fd can now avoid stat syscalls even when colorizing paths, as long as the color scheme doesn't require metadata, see #1148 (@tavianator) - The statically linked musl versions of fd now use jmalloc, leading to a significant performance improvement, see #1062 (@tavianator) Other - Added link back to GitHub in man page and --help text, see #1086 (@scottchiefbaker) - Major update in how fd handles command line options internally, see #1067 (@tmccombs) v8.4.0 Features - Support multiple --exec <cmd> instances, see #406 and #960 (@tmccombs) Bugfixes - "Argument list too long" errors can not appear anymore when using --exec-batch/-X, as the command invocations are automatically batched at the maximum possible size, even if --batch-size is not given. See #410 and #1020 (@tavianator) Changes - Directories are now printed with an additional path separator at the end: foo/bar/, see #436 and #812 (@yyogo) - The -u flag was changed to be equivalent to -HI (previously, a single -u was only equivalent to -I). Additional -u flags are still allowed, but ignored. See #840 and #986 (@jacksontheel) Other - Added installation instructions for RHEL8, see #989 (@ethsol)
Merge crossbeam-channel into `std::sync::mpsc` This PR imports the [`crossbeam-channel`](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/tree/master/crossbeam-channel#crossbeam-channel) crate into the standard library as a private module, `sync::mpmc`. `sync::mpsc` is now implemented as a thin wrapper around `sync::mpmc`. The primary purpose of this PR is to resolve rust-lang/rust#39364. The public API intentionally remains the same. The reason rust-lang/rust#39364 has not been fixed in over 5 years is that the current channel is *incredibly* complex. It was written many years ago and has sat mostly untouched since. `crossbeam-channel` has become the most popular alternative on crates.io, amassing over 30 million downloads. While crossbeam's channel is also complex, like all fast concurrent data structures, it avoids some of the major issues with the current implementation around dynamic flavor upgrades. The new implementation decides on the datastructure to be used when the channel is created, and the channel retains that structure until it is dropped. Replacing `sync::mpsc` with a simpler, less performant implementation has been discussed as an alternative. However, Rust touts itself as enabling *fearless concurrency*, and having the standard library feature a subpar implementation of a core concurrency primitive doesn't feel right. The argument is that slower is better than broken, but this PR shows that we can do better. As mentioned before, the primary purpose of this PR is to fix rust-lang/rust#39364, and so the public API intentionally remains the same. *After* that problem is fixed, the fact that `sync::mpmc` now exists makes it easier to fix the primary limitation of `mpsc`, the fact that it only supports a single consumer. spmc and mpmc are two other common concurrency patterns, and this change enables a path to deprecating `mpsc` and exposing a general `sync::channel` module that supports multiple consumers. It also implements other useful methods such as `send_timeout`. That said, exposing MPMC and other new functionality is mostly out of scope for this PR, and it would be helpful if discussion stays on topic :) For what it's worth, the new implementation has also been shown to be more performant in [some basic benchmarks](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/tree/master/crossbeam-channel/benchmarks#results). cc `@taiki-e` r? rust-lang/libs
Merge crossbeam-channel into `std::sync::mpsc` This PR imports the [`crossbeam-channel`](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/tree/master/crossbeam-channel#crossbeam-channel) crate into the standard library as a private module, `sync::mpmc`. `sync::mpsc` is now implemented as a thin wrapper around `sync::mpmc`. The primary purpose of this PR is to resolve rust-lang/rust#39364. The public API intentionally remains the same. The reason rust-lang/rust#39364 has not been fixed in over 5 years is that the current channel is *incredibly* complex. It was written many years ago and has sat mostly untouched since. `crossbeam-channel` has become the most popular alternative on crates.io, amassing over 30 million downloads. While crossbeam's channel is also complex, like all fast concurrent data structures, it avoids some of the major issues with the current implementation around dynamic flavor upgrades. The new implementation decides on the datastructure to be used when the channel is created, and the channel retains that structure until it is dropped. Replacing `sync::mpsc` with a simpler, less performant implementation has been discussed as an alternative. However, Rust touts itself as enabling *fearless concurrency*, and having the standard library feature a subpar implementation of a core concurrency primitive doesn't feel right. The argument is that slower is better than broken, but this PR shows that we can do better. As mentioned before, the primary purpose of this PR is to fix rust-lang/rust#39364, and so the public API intentionally remains the same. *After* that problem is fixed, the fact that `sync::mpmc` now exists makes it easier to fix the primary limitation of `mpsc`, the fact that it only supports a single consumer. spmc and mpmc are two other common concurrency patterns, and this change enables a path to deprecating `mpsc` and exposing a general `sync::channel` module that supports multiple consumers. It also implements other useful methods such as `send_timeout`. That said, exposing MPMC and other new functionality is mostly out of scope for this PR, and it would be helpful if discussion stays on topic :) For what it's worth, the new implementation has also been shown to be more performant in [some basic benchmarks](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/tree/master/crossbeam-channel/benchmarks#results). cc `@taiki-e` r? rust-lang/libs
We'll need to ask the poller thread another thing besides to shut down, so it's cleaner to start using proper messages. The mpsc channel in the std lib was buggy for awhile but since they merged crossbeam and are using this behind the hood now it should be fine starting with Rust 1.67. That's (slightly) higher than our MSRV but it's what we use for releases so that's reasonable. See rust-lang/rust#39364 for details.
We'll need to ask the poller thread another thing besides to shut down, so it's cleaner to start using proper messages. The mpsc channel in the std lib was buggy for awhile but since they merged crossbeam and are using this behind the hood now it should be fine starting with Rust 1.67. That's (slightly) higher than our MSRV but it's what we use for releases so that's reasonable. See rust-lang/rust#39364 for details.
We'll need to ask the poller thread another thing besides to shut down, so it's cleaner to start using proper messages. The mpsc channel in the std lib was buggy for awhile but since they merged crossbeam and are using this behind the hood now it should be fine starting with Rust 1.67. That's (slightly) higher than our MSRV but it's what we use for releases so that's reasonable. See rust-lang/rust#39364 for details.
Merge crossbeam-channel into `std::sync::mpsc` This PR imports the [`crossbeam-channel`](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/tree/master/crossbeam-channel#crossbeam-channel) crate into the standard library as a private module, `sync::mpmc`. `sync::mpsc` is now implemented as a thin wrapper around `sync::mpmc`. The primary purpose of this PR is to resolve rust-lang/rust#39364. The public API intentionally remains the same. The reason rust-lang/rust#39364 has not been fixed in over 5 years is that the current channel is *incredibly* complex. It was written many years ago and has sat mostly untouched since. `crossbeam-channel` has become the most popular alternative on crates.io, amassing over 30 million downloads. While crossbeam's channel is also complex, like all fast concurrent data structures, it avoids some of the major issues with the current implementation around dynamic flavor upgrades. The new implementation decides on the datastructure to be used when the channel is created, and the channel retains that structure until it is dropped. Replacing `sync::mpsc` with a simpler, less performant implementation has been discussed as an alternative. However, Rust touts itself as enabling *fearless concurrency*, and having the standard library feature a subpar implementation of a core concurrency primitive doesn't feel right. The argument is that slower is better than broken, but this PR shows that we can do better. As mentioned before, the primary purpose of this PR is to fix rust-lang/rust#39364, and so the public API intentionally remains the same. *After* that problem is fixed, the fact that `sync::mpmc` now exists makes it easier to fix the primary limitation of `mpsc`, the fact that it only supports a single consumer. spmc and mpmc are two other common concurrency patterns, and this change enables a path to deprecating `mpsc` and exposing a general `sync::channel` module that supports multiple consumers. It also implements other useful methods such as `send_timeout`. That said, exposing MPMC and other new functionality is mostly out of scope for this PR, and it would be helpful if discussion stays on topic :) For what it's worth, the new implementation has also been shown to be more performant in [some basic benchmarks](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/tree/master/crossbeam-channel/benchmarks#results). cc `@taiki-e` r? rust-lang/libs
Merge crossbeam-channel into `std::sync::mpsc` This PR imports the [`crossbeam-channel`](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/tree/master/crossbeam-channel#crossbeam-channel) crate into the standard library as a private module, `sync::mpmc`. `sync::mpsc` is now implemented as a thin wrapper around `sync::mpmc`. The primary purpose of this PR is to resolve rust-lang/rust#39364. The public API intentionally remains the same. The reason rust-lang/rust#39364 has not been fixed in over 5 years is that the current channel is *incredibly* complex. It was written many years ago and has sat mostly untouched since. `crossbeam-channel` has become the most popular alternative on crates.io, amassing over 30 million downloads. While crossbeam's channel is also complex, like all fast concurrent data structures, it avoids some of the major issues with the current implementation around dynamic flavor upgrades. The new implementation decides on the datastructure to be used when the channel is created, and the channel retains that structure until it is dropped. Replacing `sync::mpsc` with a simpler, less performant implementation has been discussed as an alternative. However, Rust touts itself as enabling *fearless concurrency*, and having the standard library feature a subpar implementation of a core concurrency primitive doesn't feel right. The argument is that slower is better than broken, but this PR shows that we can do better. As mentioned before, the primary purpose of this PR is to fix rust-lang/rust#39364, and so the public API intentionally remains the same. *After* that problem is fixed, the fact that `sync::mpmc` now exists makes it easier to fix the primary limitation of `mpsc`, the fact that it only supports a single consumer. spmc and mpmc are two other common concurrency patterns, and this change enables a path to deprecating `mpsc` and exposing a general `sync::channel` module that supports multiple consumers. It also implements other useful methods such as `send_timeout`. That said, exposing MPMC and other new functionality is mostly out of scope for this PR, and it would be helpful if discussion stays on topic :) For what it's worth, the new implementation has also been shown to be more performant in [some basic benchmarks](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/tree/master/crossbeam-channel/benchmarks#results). cc `@taiki-e` r? rust-lang/libs
I'm having a problem using a channel to send notifications to a background thread... As I understand it, this shouldn't be possible? Receiver::recv() is not supposed to panic, is it? I'm not doing anything unsafe...
Mentioned this on reddit and burntsushi has confirmed that this looks like a bug. I will try and produce some simpler code to reproduce this but don't have time at the moment. (edit - please nag me if i don't produce an example, I have a vague idea what will do it)
I've tried this with stable (1.14) and nightly and get the same result.
A copy of the code which generates the error is available here:
https://github.com/jamespharaoh/rust-output/tree/channel_recv_panic
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: