-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dyn* trait #158
Labels
lang-initiative
An active lang team initiative
major-change
Major change proposal
T-lang
to-announce
Not yet announced MCP proposals
Comments
nikomatsakis
added
major-change
Major change proposal
lang-initiative
An active lang team initiative
T-lang
labels
Apr 14, 2022
This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed. |
Per the new process, this is an active experiment, with myself as the lang-team champion. Tracking issue is here rust-lang/rust#102425. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
lang-initiative
An active lang team initiative
major-change
Major change proposal
T-lang
to-announce
Not yet announced MCP proposals
Proposal
Summary and problem statement
dyn* Trait
) that represents "some pointer-sized type T that implements Trait"Motivation, use-cases, and solution sketches
See this blog post:
https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps//blog/2022/03/29/dyn-can-we-make-dyn-sized/
Initial people involved
What happens now?
This issue is part of the lang-team initiative process. Once this issue is filed, a Zulip topic will be opened for discussion, and the lang-team will review open proposals in its weekly triage meetings. You should receive feedback within a week or two.
This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: