-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CephFilesystem CRD with CephBlockPoolRados Namespace #14506
Comments
@NoctivagusObitus I'd suggest considering subvolume groups. |
@travisn tahnks for your response. the point of writing down all of the info I read up on is me asking for some help to better understand these concepts. I have not yet given up on the subvolume groups. could someone give me a hint on how I would properly configure those given I want 2 subvolume groups and have 2 users each being able to exclusively access only one of the subvolume groups? (I do have a local test cluster running by now.) thanks a lot. |
Is this a bug report or feature request?
What should the feature do:
As stated by Ceph documentation it is possible to have multiple CephFs properly isolated on a single pool only if they are related to there dedicated RADOS namespace. I would like to see the option to specify such a RADOS namespace in the CephFs CRD similar to how it is done within the StorageClass examepl.
What is use case behind this feature:
This request has a classic X -> Y relation. My actual desire is to use a rook cluster and it's (very nice) declarative nature to manage cloud like storage for multiple users. This means have an arbitrary amount of users connect to the Ceph cluster via the internet and mount there own CephFs with no option to access any objects of any other CephFs / user. Other suggestion to solve this will be appreciated as well.
Environment:
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: