Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editor: add field acquisition_date in the quick access #3032

Closed
pronguen opened this issue Aug 4, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3060
Closed

Editor: add field acquisition_date in the quick access #3032

pronguen opened this issue Aug 4, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3060
Labels
effort: minor Solved quickly enhancement Improvement of an existing feature f: editor Concerns editor based on JSON schema AND custom editor p-High High priority (to be solved in the 2-3 next months)

Comments

@pronguen
Copy link
Contributor

pronguen commented Aug 4, 2022

How it works

Since v1.12.0, fields without values are not present in the editor in case of an update. This concerns field acquisition_date which was always present.

Context:

  • Librarians usually creates an item before receiving it (for the acquisition). They remove the acquisition date field.
  • They edit the item and add the acquisition date field once the item is actually received.

Improvement suggestion

Field acquisition_date is present in the quick access

@pronguen pronguen added enhancement Improvement of an existing feature effort: minor Solved quickly f: editor Concerns editor based on JSON schema AND custom editor p-High High priority (to be solved in the 2-3 next months) labels Aug 4, 2022
PascalRepond added a commit to PascalRepond/rero-ils that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2022
* Adds field to the quick access for easy adding.
* Closes rero#3032.

Co-Authored-by: Pascal Repond <[email protected]>
PascalRepond added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2022
* Adds field to the quick access for easy adding.
* Closes #3032.

Co-Authored-by: Pascal Repond <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
effort: minor Solved quickly enhancement Improvement of an existing feature f: editor Concerns editor based on JSON schema AND custom editor p-High High priority (to be solved in the 2-3 next months)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant