Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Local field for holdings (incl. prediction) not well formated #1985

Closed
pronguen opened this issue Jun 7, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Local field for holdings (incl. prediction) not well formated #1985

pronguen opened this issue Jun 7, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
f: data migration Data migration from a legacy system or a previous version p-Low Low priority
Milestone

Comments

@pronguen
Copy link
Contributor

pronguen commented Jun 7, 2021

How it works

Local field for holdings (incl. prediction) not well formated.

image

How it should works

  • keep the MARC sub-fields
  • keep all 853 in different values of local_field_1
@pronguen pronguen added correction f: data migration Data migration from a legacy system or a previous version labels Jun 7, 2021
@pronguen pronguen added this to the v1.3.0 milestone Jun 9, 2021
@iGormilhit iGormilhit added the p-Low Low priority label Jun 9, 2021
@BadrAly BadrAly closed this as completed Jun 10, 2021
@pronguen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Partially correct. New correction needed: each local field in a dedicated value.
This is a mass correction to be done by RERO+.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
f: data migration Data migration from a legacy system or a previous version p-Low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants