PEP 622: make the binding semantics explicit #1490
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
gvanrossum
approved these changes
Jul 2, 2020
AA-Turner
pushed a commit
to AA-Turner/peps
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2020
mnm678
pushed a commit
to mnm678/peps
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2020
gaborbernat
pushed a commit
to gaborbernat/peps
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This addresses issues discussed in gvanrossum/patma#110 about clarity of names bound when a failed pattern has succesful partial matches