Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport maintenance/3.0.x] [used-before-assignment] Fix FP for try/else/continue #9381

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 7d0c7ac from #9374.

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 3.0.4 milestone Jan 22, 2024
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added the False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code label Jan 22, 2024
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas enabled auto-merge (squash) January 22, 2024 18:22
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0bbaddc) 95.78% compared to head (1063b8f) 95.78%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/3.0.x    #9381    /-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              95.78%   95.78%           
==================================================
  Files                    173      173           
  Lines                  18696    18699     3     
==================================================
  Hits                   17908    17911     3     
  Misses                   788      788           
Files Coverage Δ
pylint/checkers/variables.py 97.38% <100.00%> ( <0.01%) ⬆️

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit b2b54cd into maintenance/3.0.x Jan 22, 2024
25 checks passed
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas deleted the backport-9374-to-maintenance/3.0.x branch January 22, 2024 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants