Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the help accurate: multiple modules are allowed #1449

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2017
Merged

Make the help accurate: multiple modules are allowed #1449

merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2017

Conversation

nedbat
Copy link
Contributor

@nedbat nedbat commented Apr 25, 2017

Fixes / new features

  • Improves the help description, to indicate that multiple modules or packages are allowed.

@@ -7,9 7,10 @@ Invoking Pylint

Pylint is meant to be called from the command line. The usage is ::

pylint [options] module_or_package
pylint [options] modules_or_packages
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just an idea - but maybe we should indicate that we accept multiple arguments in usage section?

Something along a lines of:

  • pylint [options] module_or_package...
  • pylint [options] module_or_package [module_or_package...]
  • other format?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had tried to do that by making the terms plural. Are you suggesting something else?

@rogalski rogalski added the Needs review 🔍 Needs to be reviewed by one or multiple more persons label May 9, 2017
@PCManticore
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @nedbat This is good enough

@PCManticore PCManticore merged commit da7566a into pylint-dev:master May 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs review 🔍 Needs to be reviewed by one or multiple more persons
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants