-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src,node-api: update napi_is_detached_arraybuffer
using ArrayBuffer::WasDetached
#45538
src,node-api: update napi_is_detached_arraybuffer
using ArrayBuffer::WasDetached
#45538
Conversation
This gets `napi_is_detached_arraybuffer(..)` to use the new API, `ArrayBuffer::WasDetached`, that looks more straightforward. Signed-off-by: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]>
Review requested:
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@daeyeon do you know what version of Node.js contain versions of V8 that support the new API? Just thinking about how we tag in terms of backports. |
v8 10.9.111 adds this function. Referencing commit v8/v8@9df5ef7 |
Only the current main (v20-pre) contains the new API and it's added through this patch, 5b8b921. I think its backporting would be possible since the API depends on only v8's internal |
Landed in be049df |
This gets `napi_is_detached_arraybuffer(..)` to use the new API, `ArrayBuffer::WasDetached`, that looks more straightforward. Signed-off-by: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#45538 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This gets `napi_is_detached_arraybuffer(..)` to use the new API, `ArrayBuffer::WasDetached`, that looks more straightforward. Signed-off-by: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]> PR-URL: #45538 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This gets `napi_is_detached_arraybuffer(..)` to use the new API, `ArrayBuffer::WasDetached`, that looks more straightforward. Signed-off-by: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]> PR-URL: #45538 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This gets `napi_is_detached_arraybuffer(..)` to use the new API, `ArrayBuffer::WasDetached`, that looks more straightforward. Signed-off-by: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]> PR-URL: #45538 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This gets `napi_is_detached_arraybuffer(..)` to use the new API, `ArrayBuffer::WasDetached`, that looks more straightforward. Signed-off-by: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]> PR-URL: #45538 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This gets `napi_is_detached_arraybuffer(..)` to use the new API, `ArrayBuffer::WasDetached`, that looks more straightforward. Signed-off-by: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]> PR-URL: #45538 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This gets `napi_is_detached_arraybuffer(..)` to use the new API, `ArrayBuffer::WasDetached`, that looks more straightforward. Signed-off-by: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]> PR-URL: #45538 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This updates
napi_is_detached_arraybuffer(...)
using the new API below which looks more straightforward.node/deps/v8/include/v8-array-buffer.h
Lines 243 to 246 in db88483
Signed-off-by: Daeyeon Jeong [email protected]