Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix playground samples type errors and add CI test #3722

Merged

Conversation

tamayika
Copy link
Contributor

@tamayika tamayika commented Mar 4, 2023

I found several playground samples have type errors.
So I added type checking test script and test CI to github actions.

Copy link
Member

@hediet hediet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks a lot! Please see my comments.

@tamayika tamayika force-pushed the feature/website-playground-examples-type-check branch from 6abbb79 to 2b3444b Compare March 7, 2023 12:03
@tamayika
Copy link
Contributor Author

tamayika commented Mar 7, 2023

I made all in parallel.
But it saved only 10sec because Github Action's cpu spec is poor(2cpu).
In my environment(24cpu), it takes only 10sec to process all.

To pass all files to one tsc process failed due to const editor confliction.

@hediet
Copy link
Member

hediet commented Mar 7, 2023

Thanks! :)
Generally, please try to not force push to a PR that has been reviewed, as it resets what has been reviewed already. We have the policy to check every changed line we merge to main and a force push forces us to check all the files again.

@hediet hediet merged commit 80ee9b3 into microsoft:main Mar 7, 2023
@tamayika tamayika deleted the feature/website-playground-examples-type-check branch March 7, 2023 13:33
@hediet hediet added this to the March 2023 milestone Mar 8, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants