Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strengthen coverage for CustomFilter model #32479

Closed

Conversation

mjankowski
Copy link
Contributor

Extracted from #31775

Improve validation specs, add expires_in coverage.

Future thing - this model includes the expireable module and also has its own expires_in (which takes precedence). This is fine, and I think desired, may want to double-check/rename and/or see if the logic here would be relevant/desirable to other spots which include the module.

@mjankowski mjankowski added the testing Automated lint and test suites label Oct 17, 2024
@mjankowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

may want to double-check/rename and/or see if the logic here would be relevant/desirable to other spots which include the module.

Yup!

@mjankowski mjankowski force-pushed the spec-model-validation-custom-filter branch 2 times, most recently from 265a935 to 9615fff Compare November 16, 2024 22:21
@mjankowski mjankowski force-pushed the spec-model-validation-custom-filter branch from 9615fff to cafa771 Compare November 22, 2024 15:15
@mjankowski mjankowski force-pushed the spec-model-validation-custom-filter branch 2 times, most recently from 479575c to 5e9c7e0 Compare November 26, 2024 14:05
@mjankowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Would this be easier reviewed with the added expires_in coverage pulled out first?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
testing Automated lint and test suites
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant