Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI smoke test #1627

Draft
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

CI smoke test #1627

wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

Consolatis
Copy link
Member

@Consolatis Consolatis commented Mar 16, 2024

I've seen a segfaut on void with the new runtime test once (on a PR without any actual changes that could cause it) but retrying the job didn't show the segfault again. Unfortunately, only the first test failed and the 2nd run under gdb that should provide the stacktrace didn't fail. So lets do repeated runs for a bit.

Not yet sure if we should actually add this to the CI, likely not. Or maybe as a custom job that can only be triggered manually.

@Consolatis Consolatis added this to the 0.7.2 milestone Mar 16, 2024
Consolatis added a commit to Consolatis/labwc that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2024
Otherwise the runtime test randomly fails due to
strange pango behavior. This is a workaround for
the issue and not a permanent fix.

A full investigation into pango internals is required
to figure out why `pango_layout_get_extents()` returns
invalid data after the first call. See PR labwc#1627 for a
testcase.
Consolatis added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2024
Otherwise the runtime test randomly fails due to
strange pango behavior. This is a workaround for
the issue and not a permanent fix.

A full investigation into pango internals is required
to figure out why `pango_layout_get_extents()` returns
invalid data after the first call. See PR #1627 for a
testcase.
@Consolatis Consolatis removed this from the 0.7.2 milestone Apr 11, 2024
grisha128 pushed a commit to grisha128/labwc that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
Otherwise the runtime test randomly fails due to
strange pango behavior. This is a workaround for
the issue and not a permanent fix.

A full investigation into pango internals is required
to figure out why `pango_layout_get_extents()` returns
invalid data after the first call. See PR labwc#1627 for a
testcase.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant