Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rate too high #1572

Closed
reserve85 opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 · 8 comments
Closed

Rate too high #1572

reserve85 opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 · 8 comments
Assignees
@jomjol
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@reserve85
Copy link

reserve85 commented Dec 13, 2022 •
edited
Loading

The Problem

Hallo, seit FW Release: v13.0.7 (Commit: 304b9e0) habe ich ein Problem mit "Rate too high". Ich habe auch schon die MaxRateValue hochgesetzt und SetPreviousValue aktualisiert, aber funktioniert nicht.

Rate too high - Read: 31226.80 - Pre: 31226.67

image
image

update: mit Release: v13.0.5 (Commit: e23c89a) funktioniert es einwandfrei.

Version

Release: v13.0.7 (Commit: 304b9e0)

Logfile

[      16] 2022-12-13T08:54:39 <ERR> [MQTT IF] Init with no Client_ID () or Last Will Topic (). Abort Init!
[      16] 2022-12-13T08:54:39 <ERR> [MQTT IF] Init failed, skipping all MQTT publishings in this round!
[     316] 2022-12-13T08:59:39 <ERR> [MQTT IF] Init with no Client_ID () or Last Will Topic (). Abort Init!
[     316] 2022-12-13T08:59:39 <ERR> [MQTT IF] Init failed, skipping all MQTT publishings in this round!
[     616] 2022-12-13T09:04:39 <ERR> [MQTT IF] Init with no Client_ID () or Last Will Topic (). Abort Init!
[     616] 2022-12-13T09:04:39 <ERR> [MQTT IF] Init failed, skipping all MQTT publishings in this round!

Expected Behavior

No response

Screenshots

No response

Additional Context

No response
@reserve85 reserve85 added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 13, 2022
@haverland
Copy link
Collaborator

Benutze AbsolutChange. Ratechange ist pro minute, was bei alle 5 Minuten Probe = 0,5/5 ist.

@reserve85
Copy link
Author

Besten Dank, das funktioniert einwandfrei. War mir irgendwie nicht bewusst, das war dann irgendwie schon immer falsch eingestellt und hat komischerweise funktioniert.

@jomjol
Copy link
Owner

jomjol commented Dec 13, 2022

RateChange hat leider auch einen internen Fehler - bin da dran, daher Reopen

@jomjol jomjol reopened this Dec 13, 2022
@jomjol
Copy link
Owner

jomjol commented Dec 14, 2022

Fixed in newest Rolling

@jomjol jomjol closed this as completed Dec 14, 2022
@copadewe
Copy link

copadewe commented Feb 4, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Hallo jomjol, bin absoluter Anfänger vielleicht auch ein Fehler meinerseits, aber das thema hier passte.
grafik
Ich habe die Kamera auf dem Wasserzähler eingerichtet, erkennt alles, aber zeigt immer Error an.
grafik
Nachdem ich versuchte die Daten zu ändern, (-> Settings -> Set pr...) zeigte es kein Bild mehr an und
seitdem bin ich in der Warteschleife zum reboot.
Der Log vor meiner Änderung sagt nichts darüber:

[0d00h00m04s] 2023-02-04T13:05:05 [MAIN] ==================== Startup ====================
[0d00h00m04s] 2023-02-04T13:05:05 [MAIN] =================================================
[0d00h00m04s] 2023-02-04T13:05:05 [MAIN] Branch: 'HEAD', Revision: 04f2f23 , Date/Time: 2022-12-19 20:41, Web UI: Release: v13.0.8 (Commit: 04f2f23 )
[0d00h00m04s] 2023-02-04T13:05:05 [MAIN] Reset reason: Via esp_restart
[0d00h00m08s] 2023-02-04T13:05:09 [MAIN] =================================================
[0d00h00m08s] 2023-02-04T13:05:09 [MAIN] ================== Main Started =================
[0d00h00m08s] 2023-02-04T13:05:09 [MAIN] =================================================
[0d00h00m08s] 2023-02-04T13:05:09 [MAIN] The device has 8 MBytes of PSRAM
[0d00h00m10s] 2023-02-04T13:05:11 [MAIN] Initialization completed successfully!
[0d00h00m04s] 2023-02-04T14:15:12 [MAIN] =================================================
[0d00h00m04s] 2023-02-04T14:15:12 [MAIN] ==================== Startup ====================
[0d00h00m04s] 2023-02-04T14:15:12 [MAIN] =================================================
[0d00h00m04s] 2023-02-04T14:15:12 [MAIN] Branch: 'HEAD', Revision: 04f2f23 , Date/Time: 2022-12-19 20:41, Web UI: Release: v13.0.8 (Commit: 04f2f23 )
[0d00h00m04s] 2023-02-04T14:15:12 [MAIN] Reset reason: Via esp_restart
[0d00h00m08s] 2023-02-04T14:15:16 [MAIN] =================================================
[0d00h00m08s] 2023-02-04T14:15:16 [MAIN] ================== Main Started =================
[0d00h00m08s] 2023-02-04T14:15:16 [MAIN] =================================================
[0d00h00m08s] 2023-02-04T14:15:16 [MAIN] The device has 8 MBytes of PSRAM
[0d00h00m10s] 2023-02-04T14:15:18 [MAIN] Initialization completed successfully!

Es scheint auch so, als wenn bei den Daten dann (( -> System -> Data Viewer)) ein Datum von 1918 steht ?
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.028,374.028,42.0134,-0.000020,,,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.4,8.5
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.028,,42.0134,,,Rate too high - Read: 374.028 - Pre: 42.013 - Rate: 332.015,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.4,8.5
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.028,374.028,42.0134,-0.000020,,,3.2,7.0,3.9,0.2,2.4,8.1
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.028,,42.0134,,,Rate too high - Read: 374.028 - Pre: 42.013 - Rate: 332.015,3.2,7.0,3.9,0.2,2.4,8.1
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.028,374.028,42.0134,-0.000020,,,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.2,2.4,8.7
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.028,,42.0134,,,Rate too high - Read: 374.028 - Pre: 42.013 - Rate: 332.015,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.2,2.4,8.7
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.027,374.027,42.0134,-0.000020,,,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.4,7.6
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.027,,42.0134,,,Rate too high - Read: 374.027 - Pre: 42.013 - Rate: 332.014,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.4,7.6
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.027,374.027,42.0134,-0.000020,,,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.9,7.8
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.027,,42.0134,,,Rate too high - Read: 374.027 - Pre: 42.013 - Rate: 332.014,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.9,7.8
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.027,374.027,42.0134,-0.000020,,,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.9,7.8
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.027,,42.0134,,,Rate too high - Read: 374.027 - Pre: 42.013 - Rate: 332.014,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.9,7.8
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.027,374.027,42.0134,-0.000020,,,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.9,7.9
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.027,,42.0134,,,Rate too high - Read: 374.027 - Pre: 42.013 - Rate: 332.014,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,2.9,7.9
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.029,374.029,42.0134,-0.000020,,,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,3.2,9.4
1918-10-14T01:55:32,main,374.029,,42.0134,,,Rate too high - Read: 374.029 - Pre: 42.013 - Rate: 332.016,3.3,7.0,3.9,0.3,3.2,9.4

EDIT
Hat sich aufgehängt, nach Änderung der Pre Value, nach Neustart Luft es jetzt

@Hans80939
Copy link

image

Wie kann man hier eine 9 statt eine 6 erkennen, was kann ich tun, um die Erkennung zu verbessern?

image

@haverland
Copy link
Collaborator

Du benutzt ein dig-class100/dig-cont model. Die ROIs sollten wie in der Doku konfiguriert werden. https://jomjol.github.io/AI-on-the-edge-device-docs/ROI-Configuration/#setup-using-dig-class100-or-dig-cont-models

Alternativ ein anderes Model probieren.

Wenn das alles nicht hilft Bilder sammeln und uns zukommen lassen. Das verbessert die Erkennung. Aber bitte vorher die ROIs entsprechend der Anleitung, sonst macht das Labeln auch keinen Spaß.

https://jomjol.github.io/AI-on-the-edge-device-docs/collect-new-images/

@Hans80939
Copy link

Hans80939 commented Jan 18, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jomjol jomjol

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@haverland @jomjol @Hans80939 @reserve85 @copadewe