Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: API Reference for Threads, Messages, Assistants #686

Closed
dan-jan opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #679
Closed

docs: API Reference for Threads, Messages, Assistants #686

dan-jan opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #679
Assignees
Labels
P0: critical Mission critical
Milestone

Comments

@dan-jan
Copy link
Contributor

dan-jan commented Nov 22, 2023

  • assistants (hiro has specs)
  • threads (nicole)
  • messages (nicole)
  • chats (TBA)
@0xSage 0xSage changed the title [docs] API Reference for Models, Threads, Messages docs: API Reference for Models, Threads, Messages Nov 22, 2023
@hahuyhoang411
Copy link
Contributor

hahuyhoang411 commented Nov 22, 2023

This is done in PR #679 for the draft. @hieu-jan please take it from there to save your time

@0xSage 0xSage added this to the v0.3.2 milestone Nov 22, 2023
@0xSage 0xSage added the P0: critical Mission critical label Nov 22, 2023
@0xSage 0xSage changed the title docs: API Reference for Models, Threads, Messages docs: API Reference for Models, Threads, Messages, Assistants Nov 22, 2023
@0xSage
Copy link
Contributor

0xSage commented Nov 22, 2023

Related PR: #681

@0xSage 0xSage changed the title docs: API Reference for Models, Threads, Messages, Assistants docs: API Reference for Threads, Messages, Assistants Nov 22, 2023
@0xSage
Copy link
Contributor

0xSage commented Nov 24, 2023

fixed

@0xSage 0xSage closed this as completed Nov 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P0: critical Mission critical
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants