Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: describe the automated security scanning system #2340

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

McPatate
Copy link
Member

As requested by @datavistics, adding a short description of the automated security scanner in the blog post to make it more comprehensive.

@datavistics
Copy link
Contributor

It looks good to me!

Copy link
Contributor

@datavistics datavistics left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These look great!

Copy link
Member

@pcuenca pcuenca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, assuming there's no security risk in disclosing the tools we use.

Just an idea, maybe backlink to the trufflehog post for more details?

Copy link
Member

@Vaibhavs10 Vaibhavs10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be merged soon? Perhaps we can iterate on a follow up PR for any further feedback ✨

@McPatate
Copy link
Member Author

Should this be merged soon? Perhaps we can iterate on a follow up PR for any further feedback ✨

Yes! Merging I'll add @pcuenca's request in a subsequent PR, I'll reference this one.

@McPatate McPatate merged commit 5271ec5 into main Oct 17, 2024
@McPatate McPatate deleted the feat/describe_automated_security_scanning_system branch October 17, 2024 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants