Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

建议开源版出一个文件管理 管理每个组件容器里的文件 不然用起来太麻烦了 #1831

Open
2363830288 opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Feature Suggestions
Milestone

Comments

@2363830288
Copy link

建议开源版出一个文件管理 管理每个组件容器里的文件 不然用起来太麻烦了

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


Title: It is recommended that the open source version should have a file manager to manage the files in each component container, otherwise it will be too troublesome to use.

It is recommended that the open source version should have a file manager to manage the files in each component container, otherwise it will be too troublesome to use

@ZhangSetSail
Copy link
Collaborator

暂时是企业版功能,后期可以考虑开放出来

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


This is an enterprise version feature for the time being and may be considered to be released later.

@yangkaa yangkaa added the kind/feature Feature Suggestions label Jan 15, 2024
@yangkaa yangkaa added this to the 5.18.0 milestone Jan 15, 2024
@yangkaa
Copy link
Collaborator

yangkaa commented Jan 15, 2024

我们预计在 5.18 版本将该功能开放出来

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


We expect to open this feature in version 5.18

@JasonJunMa
Copy link

我们预计在 5.18 版本将该功能开放出来

Hope this is true. Can't wait anymore.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Feature Suggestions
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants