Implement stricter parsing in Requirements.parseRestrictionsLegacy (take 2) #2824
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
thank you so much! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This supersedes reverted PR #2816, which caused issue #2822
It seems some existing files in the wild incorrectly used e.g.
frameworks: net40instead offramework: net40, and the previous 'loose' parsing would parse the resulting expressions net40as= net40. The stricter version previously merged would bail assisn't a valid framework.This PR changes to first check for
frameworksand thenframeworkmeaning the two are now interchangeable and existing files such as those described in #2822 will continue to work.