Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Packet 0.39.0, using "." as target no longer works #756

Closed
neoeinstein opened this issue Apr 8, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Packet 0.39.0, using "." as target no longer works #756

neoeinstein opened this issue Apr 8, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@neoeinstein
Copy link

I have a Paket template that uses the specification:

files
    bin/Release/* ==> .

Prior to 0.39.0, using the . was a way to put the files at the root of a nupkg. (As is required for Octopus Deploy packages) Now this puts the files inside of a folder named ..

Alternates that I've tried include:

files
    bin/Release/* ==>

But that just puts the files inside a folder with no name.

If this specification is no longer valid, is there an alternate way of specifying that the globbed files should be archived in the root?
neoeinstein referenced this issue Apr 8, 2015
@forki
Ensure trailing slash on target dir
a55113b
@forki forki closed this as completed in e668e24 Apr 8, 2015
@forki
Copy link
Member

forki commented Apr 8, 2015

could you please check if 0.39.1 fixes this?

/cc @Vidarls @mavnn

@neoeinstein
Copy link
Author

0.39.1 provides a viable workaround, namely using

files
    bin/Release/* ==>

which is my preferred method of handling this. The special case for . still puts things in a folder named .. I'd either remove the special case and recommend using a blank string instead, or have . interpreted the same as a blank string.

I consider my issue closed, however.

forki added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 9, 2015
@forki
Allow . in target file names for pack - fixes #756
81c422d
@forki
Copy link
Member

forki commented Apr 9, 2015

could you please retry with .?

@neoeinstein
Copy link
Author

Looks good for .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@neoeinstein @forki