-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 520
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Long feeds not working - we need pagination #223
Comments
@forki Yes we did. Can't test right now, worked last week without issues. AlexAlexander Groß On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Steffen Forkmann [email protected]
|
I haven't been able to test until now. I'll see when I have more time, will be back with output from your commands. |
@forki Tested against TeamCity, still working for me. |
|
Are using TeamCity as well? Which version? |
Version 8.1.4 (build 30168) Perhaps it's a parsing issue? Can the verbose mode print what request it's sending? |
And can you give an example of your working paket.dependencies-file? |
You can check with fiddler, I think that'll help us a lot. AlexAlexander Groß On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Henrik Feldt [email protected]
|
The stacktrace indicate that the communication with teamcity succeeded.
|
I think you aren't paginating, because the result is on the nth page (many builds) of the atom feed that is returned (it seems to produce a well formed XML result). Also, the first request is a 404, but I hardly think that matters; it's an "optimisation" for those servers that support it, I suppose. |
Thanks a lot. Yes the first 404 is for probing faster api. Any ideas for a good pagination strategy? Can we discover whether there
|
Just follow the next link. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5005 I tried to help you by customizing the filter to a version, directly, but when the syntax parses correctly (and I'm not getting Java-stacktraces from TC) then there are no entries. I might have the wrong OData (?) syntax though, but I'm not inclined at this point to dive deeper into the details of this MSFT-only format =) |
Thanks. Did you just say nuget uses it's own OData format? |
No, don't quote me on that, please ;) I know it's atom from browsing the XML. I'm just being a bit miserable this evening. |
Lol. Will look into this tomorrow. |
could you both please retry 0.4.27? |
Still not working:
With file
despite that package existing. TC 8.1.4. I think I'm following the docs properly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: