Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] Remote config conditions in Unity Editor not working? #992

Open
FrantisekHolubec opened this issue Mar 11, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@FrantisekHolubec
Copy link

[REQUIRED] Please fill in the following fields:

  • Unity editor version: 2019.4.17
  • Firebase Unity SDK version: 7.0.2
  • Source you installed the SDK: Unity Package Manager
  • Problematic Firebase Component: Remote Config
  • Other Firebase Components in use: Analytics
  • Additional SDKs you are using:
  • Platform you are using the Unity editor on: Windows
  • Platform you are targeting: Android
  • Scripting Runtime: Mono and IL2CPP

[REQUIRED] Please describe the question here:

I am trying to use User Properties for remote config to separate testing users from the live ones and i wanted the testing values also in Unity Editor, but i cannot get it to work, Editor is just ignoring all my Conditions for Remote config including app version and my custom User Properties, when run on device it works fine, but in editor i am getting only default values. Am i doing something wrong ? is there a setting to turn on Conditions for editor or is it a bug ?

thank you for reply

@FrantisekHolubec FrantisekHolubec changed the title [Question] [Question] Remote config conditions in Unity Editor not working ? Mar 11, 2021
@FrantisekHolubec FrantisekHolubec changed the title [Question] Remote config conditions in Unity Editor not working ? [Question] Remote config conditions in Unity Editor not working? Mar 11, 2021
@cynthiajoan
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Frantasad, sorry for the inconvenience. Unfortunately Remote Config desktop is not supporting full features of conditions. This is a feature request and we have it in our roadmap.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants