Docs: fix no-sequences with
examples
#12239
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[X] Documentation update
There is an unusual commented
// with
example in no-sequences documentation.It could have something with linting documentation examples (#2271) in the past?
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Removed both
with
examples from this document.The example can be uncommented now and
npm test
will work well. Nevertheless, I think thatwith
is not of particular importance for this rule, there are no examples withwith
in other rules (apart from how to disable it inno-with
andno-restricted-syntax
) so I guess it's better to avoid it in examples?Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
If it isn't okay to remove these lines, I'll revert it and just uncomment the example.