Gauss-Newton solving visualization #67
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I am not familiar with this generator syntax. I think the comment in the example might be moved to avoid black formatting, i.e., plt.show(
block=True
) # Very important when using the generator version, otherwise the program exits automaticallychanged with # Very important when using the generator version, otherwise the program exits automatically
plt.show(block=True)Also withe the |
ChabaneAmaury
added a commit
to ChabaneAmaury/pyEIT
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2022
Add Gauss-Newton generator implementation and update the example to include both the generator and non-generator version of the gauss-newton.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added a small bit of code to the Gauss-Newton solving function to enable the visualization of the process in real time. There is also a demo in the example, and I made sure not to erase the original code. The function is backward-compatible as it is optionnal to enable it, and only take a flag to be put to
True.I thought it would be nice to be implemented, since I use it personnally during debugging and solving (makes the solving process a bit less boring and annoying to look at for very long solving times).