You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for creating such a wonderful tool. Quick question - I read the BayesSapce paper and I am a bit confused - can this tool be used without a reference scRNAseq data. or do I ultimately still need a scRNAseq dataset to run BayesSapce. The vignettes aren't super clear as well.
Appreciate your time
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for reaching out. BayesSpace does not use scRNAseq data. In the manuscript, we only used scRNAseq/deconvolution methods for validation of the BayesSpace method.
@edward130603 thank you -- since spatial transcriptomics are not single cell resolution after enhancing the clustering and resolution to subspot level - is there downstream analysis to then deconvolute that sub-spot level of resolution?
We have not specifically implemented that analysis. One approach to do it would involve the following:
First predict subspot level expression using enhanceFeatures(). I suggest just doing the top HVGs rather than all genes to save compute time. Then use a deconvolution method that works on the logcounts. I believe we used CIBERSORT in the manuscript but you can try another more recent method.
Thank you for creating such a wonderful tool. Quick question - I read the BayesSapce paper and I am a bit confused - can this tool be used without a reference scRNAseq data. or do I ultimately still need a scRNAseq dataset to run BayesSapce. The vignettes aren't super clear as well.
Appreciate your time
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: